bdbdbd said:
It is irrelevant if we have enough food and energy now, but will we have enough food and energy after everyone does what they actually enjoy, instead of working. And this was your suggestion. The problems with food we currently have, are not because of efficiency or the lack of it, but because the poor people do not have enough money. There will always be unemployed people, but they're not the same people all the time, a spouse may be one that works and social welfare should keep the people from not needing to worry about if they get to eat and live when they're unemployed.
But so does communism rely on perpetual conflict. This is what people are pointing you out. There's no problem after people accept (and keep accepting) the ideology of communism or national socialism, or any other ideology there is. The rest are either dead or oppressed. |
So, you're talking about a horseshoe theory where anything from the centre is the exact same?







