By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - America is a bigger threat to world peace than North Korea

KLXVER on 14 April 2017
Puppyroach said:
Of course they are, North Korea would never be a threat of any kind, they don't have the technological resources to wage war.

So we should wait until they are before we do something?



Around the Network
jason1637 on 14 April 2017

Well we do have most of the world's nuclear weapons and the strongest military in the world so yeah we're the most dangerous country in the world but we're far from a treat.



ratuscafoarterea on 14 April 2017
VGPolyglot said:
That's not even debatable. The US has caused much more harm to the world than North Korea ever could.

I agree



VGPolyglot on 14 April 2017
jason1637 said:
Well we do have most of the world's nuclear weapons and the strongest military in the world so yeah we're the most dangerous country in the world but we're far from a treat.

I agree, the United States would have to go a long way to ever be considered a treat!



ratuscafoarterea on 15 April 2017
KLXVER said:
Puppyroach said:
Of course they are, North Korea would never be a threat of any kind, they don't have the technological resources to wage war.

So we should wait until they are before we do something?

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan HAVE DONE more harm to USA and the American people, then NK will ever do, so yes, indeed, Murica FTW.



Around the Network
KLXVER on 15 April 2017
ratuscafoarterea said:
KLXVER said:

So we should wait until they are before we do something?

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan HAVE DONE more harm to USA and the American people, then NK will ever do, so yes, indeed, Murica FTW.

Well if you want them to strike first, then fair enough I guess.



Robert_Downey_Jr. on 15 April 2017

and when the US backs off the world stage ISIS happens. Make up your minds! If you don't want us involving ourselves solve your problems



I am Iron Man

VGPolyglot on 15 April 2017
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:
and when the US backs off the world stage ISIS happens. Make up your minds! If you don't want us involving ourselves solve your problems

LOL, the US was in the Middle East when ISIS was founded.



Eagle367 on 15 April 2017
FallingTitan said:

can't we all just nuke North korea off the map and be done with them.

and russia needs to shut up. at least usa warned them to get thier shitty 4000 troops out. they are backing a chemical weapon overlord in syria why can't usa just fight russia and korea at the same time.

 

the british are right. the usa response was just and fair. it was freedom! I think they shoulda done more.

You do know that USA supports terrorists that you people call rebels in Syria. And most people in the world don't buy USA's story of Assad doing the chemical attack since there is no proof he did it. But more people do find it plausible that the US backed rebels carried out the chemical attacks. You also should know the USA is more interested in dethroning Assad to install a puppet ruler than dealing with real terrorists like Daesh. And the fact that USA has probably killed more innocents in the middle east than Assad, Daesh, Taliban or Al-Qaeda ever have. Knowing all that is a must for you whether you accept the facts or not here they are. Its not a feeling or what tour emotions tell you its the truth unbuffered and without considering anyone's feelings since the truth is devoid of feeling its just what it is



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

KLXVER on 15 April 2017
Eagle367 said:
FallingTitan said:

can't we all just nuke North korea off the map and be done with them.

and russia needs to shut up. at least usa warned them to get thier shitty 4000 troops out. they are backing a chemical weapon overlord in syria why can't usa just fight russia and korea at the same time.

 

the british are right. the usa response was just and fair. it was freedom! I think they shoulda done more.

You do know that USA supports terrorists that you people call rebels in Syria. And most people in the world don't buy USA's story of Assad doing the chemical attack since there is no proof he did it. But more people do find it plausible that the US backed rebels carried out the chemical attacks. You also should know the USA is more interested in dethroning Assad to install a puppet ruler than dealing with real terrorists like Daesh. And the fact that USA has probably killed more innocents in the middle east than Assad, Daesh, Taliban or Al-Qaeda ever have. Knowing all that is a must for you whether you accept the facts or not here they are. Its not a feeling or what tour emotions tell you its the truth unbuffered and without considering anyone's feelings since the truth is devoid of feeling its just what it is

People always use the "They have killed more, so they are worse" argument. I mean are we better than all the cops in the world that have killed someone? Was Ted Bundy better than a war veteran that has killed more people?