| vivster said: He would make another fortune on Twitch. |
He could do both, but I thought he didn't play games anymore? I never watched pewdiepie so idk
Dravenet7 said:
You'd guess wrong. "PewDiePie is taking on Youtube's new advertisment policy in a new satirical video that promises he's going to be family friendly.” My guess is OP is just being manipulative with his quotes, because literally that is the first sentence polygon wrote.
They say the same in their first sentence in the article. You guys are only making yourselves look misinformed here, not Polygon. |
I straight up said I didn't read the article and why, and followed with "My guess is..." to make it even clearer the rest of the post was speculation, not judgement. I suppose I should trust LivingMetal even less than Polygon at this point.
arcaneguyver said:
I straight up said I didn't read the article and why, and followed with "My guess is..." to make it even clearer the rest of the post was speculation, not judgement. I suppose I should trust LivingMetal even less than Polygon at this point. |
Which is why I said, "you'd guess wrong". However, away from that point, when you say something like: polytrash, you refuse to read their article, or I should trust person A even less than Polygon at this point, then yes, you passed judgment and you acted upon that judgement.
VGPolyglot said:
They do. |
Just can't make money off of it.
Should just offer a Pepsi to everyone!
| VGPolyglot said: "So I don't go homeless" come on, he's a multimillionaire, how could he go homeless? |
Those millions will disappear quickly if he puts them in the wrong place.
Dravenet7 said:
Which is why I said, "you'd guess wrong". However, away from that point, when you say something like: polytrash, you refuse to read their article, or I should trust person A even less than Polygon at this point, then yes, you passed judgment and you acted upon that judgement. |
Ah, I get it now. I slag on Polygon just about every chance I get regardless of the topic. The intent wasn't "Polygon is trash because this article" but "Polygons pretty tone deaf, but I won't dignify the dumpster fire with a click to confirm."
arcaneguyver said:
Ah, I get it now. I slag on Polygon just about every chance I get regardless of the topic. The intent wasn't "Polygon is trash because this article" but "Polygons pretty tone deaf, but I won't dignify the dumpster fire with a click to confirm." |
Ok so you don't seem to understand. When I said, "you passed judgment and you acted upon that judgement" I was referring to, ""Polygons pretty tone deaf, but I won't dignify the dumpster fire with a click to confirm."
You made your judgement about Polygon even before the article, you refused to read because of that article and simply went by Pewdiepie's video and LivingMetal. Then you made a guess about what Polygon's article. A guess that, mind you, was painfully wrong.
Now regardless of what you claim, this guess, if left unaddressed, would have been only another potential reason to further your inital judgement on Polygon. Now you can go on attack Polygon all you want. Normally I could care less as I could care less about Polygon's image. However, when you blindly spout your spite without actually looking at the information, you possibly, just like this scenario, flagrantly spread misinformation when the information is readily available. That is problematic, headache, and there is no defending that.
FAMILY FRIENDLY FELIX!
Lol youtube's definitely gone to the shitter. They already made youtube for kids. Keep splitting the demograph more till your satisfied.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
