By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
arcaneguyver said:
Dravenet7 said:

Which is why I said, "you'd guess wrong". However, away from that point, when you say something like: polytrash, you refuse to read their article, or I should trust person A even less than Polygon at this point, then yes, you passed judgment and you acted upon that judgement.

 

Ah, I get it now. I slag on Polygon just about every chance I get regardless of the topic. The intent wasn't "Polygon is trash because this article" but "Polygons pretty tone deaf, but I won't dignify the dumpster fire with a click to confirm."

Ok so you don't seem to understand. When I said, "you passed judgment and you acted upon that judgement" I was referring to, ""Polygons pretty tone deaf, but I won't dignify the dumpster fire with a click to confirm."

You made your judgement about Polygon even before the article, you refused to read because of that article and simply went by Pewdiepie's video and LivingMetal. Then you made a guess about what Polygon's article. A guess that, mind you, was painfully wrong.

Now regardless of what you claim, this guess, if left unaddressed,  would have been only another potential reason to further your inital judgement on Polygon. Now you can go on attack Polygon all you want. Normally I could care less as I could care less about Polygon's image. However, when you blindly spout your spite without actually looking at the information, you possibly,  just like this scenario, flagrantly spread misinformation when the information is readily available. That is problematic, headache, and there is no defending that.