By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - The power gap between Scorpio and PS4 Pro might be greater than the Switch and the PS4 Slim.

A pro priced at $349, a og PS4 priced at $249 with a shit ton of content is gonna make it hard for Scrorpio to compete wth PS4 despite a power gap.



Around the Network
Madword said:
Mr Puggsly said:

With that logic maybe Sony shouldn't have released the PS4 Pro.

I'm just curious to see what Scorpio can do and if it has the best ports, great.

I think that is an interesting question. Why did they release the pro, perhaps with MS doing badly with XBO, perhaps its was a threat analysis. i.e what is MS likely to do, bring out a new more powerful console before 5 years, rather than wait it out for 5 years plus. People have asked why Sony made the pro and that it didnt use different arhitecture... well I think the answer is there. Making a more powerful Pro using mostly the same components as the PS4 is cheaper and will degrade in price as the PS4 does (as they are buying bulk components, rather than small amounts of new components for a brand new console). You build a brand new console the component prices will drop very slowly if you dont make many. The Pro might not be selling millions, but as it uses mostly the same PS4 components, its price will go down and more importantly will allow for aggressive price cuts if need be.

So perhaps they thought, we can bring out a Pro, its dev cost will be small and we can put MS on the back foot, knowing they'll bring out a more powerful console at higher cost (we announce first, get the press)...personally I think Sony have pulled a blinder. It's been made even more a better move that MS doesnt do 1st party that much when compared to Sony. All the talk this year is about Sony exclusives and Switch, MS are currently the 3rd console, not just in sales but also excitement and PR. They seemingly have nothing interesting to talk about. They need to do something otherwise whats the point of the Scorpio... ok it'll run 3rd party games well, but I dont think people will care when they could go to Pro and get a reasonably running game on cheaper hardware.

Your parts point is very true. That's why they didn't opt for a new GPU, either. Instead they use two overclocked PS4 GPUs running in sync.  It means they were probably making a profit on HW at launch, and like you said, allows for aggressive price cuts. No matter what the Scorpio's price point is, we are going to see at least a $50 cut.  However, I think if MS can get it out at $399, we're going to see Sony do that aggressive cut to $299.  That's just too big of a price difference to ignore.  This may also come with a Pro Slim to decrease prices even more. And I think at that price, the Pro is going to start making up 20+% of all PS4s sold.  Probably 30+% when it hits $249.



malistix1985 said:
Random_Matt said:
IMO, will still use jaguar or at most puma.

1080/60 and 4K/30.

Sony pretty much pushed the jaquar as far as it can go in the pro and games are not running on 1080/60, take Nier or Dark Souls or Final Fantasy who all aim at that and all fail at that because of CPU limitations (analyzed by digital foundry/VGTech and they said this is the reason)

Sure the extra memory+badwith might make 4k/30 available in some games by sheer GPU power but if it does use a jag or puma 60 fps in games that arn't build from the ground up to run like that (halo 6/gears 4 multiplayer/forza are good excamples) will just fail misserably.

Every developer and insider I have read from that have Seen the hardware have praised it, there is something in there, lets hope its the CPU that will impress us because else it will be an upgrade and some will like it but it won't blow people away in the difference department, if they use a new tech CPU every games will look noticably better for anyone watching a comparison if the hardware is used.

Well it looks like in 4-5 days we will know! :D

And people praised the Switch's power. The problem is they are comparing it relative to its competitors.  Is Switch powerful? Hell no. Well, unless you just compare it to other mobile devices.  Is Scorpio incredibly powerful? When compared to PCs, no. But to other consoles, yes.  

And this will most likely be using a Jaguar or Puma, with a RX480.  Unless you want this thing costing $499+, which is a death knell with a $299-$349 Pro.  Remember, MS keep saying this is an upgrade with no exclusives. They aren't even doing VR anymore.  You honestly think they are going to put that kinda tech, which drives up the price, for a system with no exclusives? Come on, now.



thismeintiel said:

And people praised the Switch's power. The problem is they are comparing it relative to its competitors.  Is Switch powerful? Hell no. Well, unless you just compare it to other mobile devices.  Is Scorpio incredibly powerful? When compared to PCs, no. But to other consoles, yes.  

And this will most likely be using a Jaguar or Puma, with a RX480.  Unless you want this thing costing $499+, which is a death knell with a $299-$349 Pro.  Remember, MS keep saying this is an upgrade with no exclusives. They aren't even doing VR anymore.  You honestly think they are going to put that kinda tech, which drives up the price, for a system with no exclusives? Come on, now.

They are still doing VR, mixed reality is coming to the Scorpio and the jaquar prob. would do a rubish job concidering how games run on steam it requires quite a good processor, puma is a slight improvement but only 10% or so over the jaquar, obv it depends on the actual speed in this scenario, ryzen however is more then a doubling in cpu effeciency over the jaquar so that WOULD be ideal for mixed reality/VR

Obv. the PC will always be king and the Scorpio would more likely use the RX580 and not the RX480, the difference is the redesign and less heat production the ps4 pro slim, if the rumours are true will also be based on the polaris refresh thats coming out this year.

I don't know what to expect but I do know Microsoft doesn't want to make the same mistake sony did and have bottlenecks, obv sony's design does a good job of 4k checkerboarding and thats what its designed for but as dice and many other developers have stated, native is ALWAYS easier and doesn't require any work where in checkerboarding does require quite a bit of work.

The RAM will go a long way but the CPU has to be better, I don't care what they use but it has to be.




Twitter @CyberMalistix

leo-j said:
Also a 299 4k PS4 is more appealing than a 400 4k Xbox

Definitely. If Xbox fans think a 40% more powerful XBO (in comparison to the Pro), with no exclusives, is all MS needs to change things in EU and Japan, they have a rude awakening coming.  PS is a WW brand, where Xbox is only relevant in a handful of countries.



Around the Network
Pemalite said:
cura said:
Is scorpio microsoft's version of the ps 4 pro? i.e., a more powerful version of the xbox one? Or is it microsoft's next iteration of the xbox? I'm a little confused as to what it is.

It's just like a supercharged Playstation 4 Pro. All the Xbox One accessories and games will be compatible with the console.

taus90 said:
the power difference at 4 tf to 6 tf has very diminishing returns unlike the jump from ps4 to pro or xbox to scorpio..

If all the rest of the hardware remains the same. Sure. But guess what? There is more to performance than flops.

malistix1985 said:

The Power will be used effeciently because they develop games for XBox One and PC and will use the PC version and use the settings to scale with the Scorpio, 4k textures etc will automatically be available since they are created for the PC anyway.

It won't use PC's max settings in allot of demanding AAA titles.
If a high-end PC can't do AAA games at 4k with all Ultra settings, no way in hell will a more price-sensitive device like a console achieve it.

malistix1985 said:

6Tflops will be used better because the console won't run into bottlebecks, like Dark Souls III not being able to hit 60fps on PS4 pro isn't because of the speed of the GPU, a 470RX can easely hit 60fps, its most likely a memory or CPU bottleneck, many people making comparison video's like VGTech or Digital foundry have found multiple instances of memory or cpu bottlenecks on the Pro.

So the 6Tflops will be used much more favourable because of the extra memory speed, bigger memory bus and more available memory and if the rumours are true and the console uses a Ryzen architecture APU then you can take the "Tflops" fight with a grain of salt, the Scorpio will blow anything we've seen in the console space away

That depends. Just because you have an underpowered CPU doesn't mean you will always be held back by the CPU.
GPU's these days are capable of offloading a significant amount of computation that is normally reserved for the CPU... Which does help make up for any CPU deficits.
Plus games aren't a static environment, the processing load can and will change depending on what is being displayed on the screen, developers will account for that.

Converesly... We literally have zero idea what CPU Scorpio will use.
Plus using flops within the context you are using it in is incorrect anyway... It's a theoretical number. It may not even be achievable in the real world and having Bandwidth/Memory bottlenecks doesn't change the single precision floating point capabilities anyway.

Porcupine_I said:
I'm pretty sure the Scorpio can't run BOTW or Horizon: Zero Dawn at 4k and 60fps

The Xbox One has had a few emulators on it. What is to say that in the future CEMU is ported to the Xbox One and Zelda is emulated on the console?

taus90 said:

And about the ryzen rumors pray that those are not true, I dont believe ryzen will be the cpu coz MS is not dumb enough to make a deal on a cpu which was not released, without knowing the real world performance and fab yield issues, even in Hypothetical Scenario for marketing terms MS does decide to go with low end Ryzen along with VEGA GPU u can certainly kiss even a $450 price tag good bye, which will be a sucide.

The thing about Ryzen is that it had engineering samples over a year ago, so AMD and Microsoft would have had a pretty good idea on it's performance, capabilities and fabrication costs/yields.

I do agree it is way to expensive to consider though.

MohammadBadir said:
Power doesn't matter anymore. We're back to games > specs :P

Power always matters. To a point.
Scorpio being technically superior is going to ruffle some feathers around these 'ere parts.

Do you think the different memory setup is going to cause problems for the Scorpio running XBO games? Is that going to be something that needs to be patched?



Problem here is Sony has become the pacemaker for the gen. They set the launch, mid gen update and now they are already a year into getting ready for the ps5. I. E 3 years for OG, 3 years for MG, then launch the next gen.

MS have forced themselves into a corner for several reasons :

1) for almost three gens they have proven they lack exclusive content compared to Sony. They only make an effort at the beginning and then start to lose steam. They will essentially be releasing Scorpio when Sony exclusives have hit their stride. We are looking at Yakuza Kiwami, GT6, GOW, FF7 R, Day's Gone, Spiderman and Shenmue all releasing within a year from Scorpio with showing S and launches on either side of it, from E3 to E3.

2) when the Scorpio comes out, it might only have two years on the market before Sony launch a PS5 and it might be only 1.5yrs before they announce it.
In going on a theory they will have 6 year gens from now due to rapid technology advances, deals with AMD and betting able to adapt tech quicker rather once every 6-7 years.

3) they will struggle to fight Sony on price.

4) if they launch a next gen Xbox at the sametime as Sony, they will essentially screw over those who bought Scorpio by only giving that crowd 2yrs or less. If they give them 3 years ,their competitor will have a years headstart.

I'm not sure what MS could have done here instead of launching a Scorpio. Maybe being a year behind they could have just waited it out. I still believe Scorpio was a panic move on two fronts:

1) not being able to compete with 2 more powerful ps4s and

2) not having the hardware to have VR support via third party as they didn't have their own VR set.

Problem is, if the Scorpio don't do well, I can see the Xbox division having even less resources from HQ for the next time.

This E 3 should paint a good picture for the future of Xbox. If the games still aren't there outside of Halo, Forza and Gears, I will be seriously concerned. Phil really needs to bring back:

1) otogi
2) jade empire
3) perfect dark
4) a proper Banjo Game

They should have strengthened their relationship with Sega and kept it sweet instead of letting it dither away.



When you are not doing so well, release new more powerful console. That is exactly how Sega lost the game, while Nitendo and Sony focused on supporting their existing systems and, most importantly, games. Even with higher spec, if MS can't match it's price with PS4 Pro, which most certainly they can't, Sony has nothing to worry about MS taking sales away. In fact, MS officially mentioned that Scorpio isn't meant to compete with PS4.



Sony isn't going to do much different, they will just dell as much PS4's as possible to 2020. Since the PS4 obviously has plenty of sales and hardware/software potential. Once they sold around 110 million in 2020 they kick off a new gen with the PS5. Microsoft will launch a new Xbox and hopefully that gen will be more intresting saleswise.



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar

EricHiggin said:

There's many possibilities in my opinion. Shooting from downtown on this one.

-PS4 SS ($199) and Pro S ($349) launch. E3 2017.
-PS4 SS ($199), Pro S Digital ($299), Pro 4k BD ($399). E3 2017.
-PS4 Portable teasers. Before E3 2018.
-PS4 Portable launch. E3 2018 ($249).
-PS5 teaser. Before E3 2019.
-PS5 launch. E3 2019. (8 core Zen+, 10Tflop Vega/Navi, 16gb HBM2 ?) ($399).
-PS Phone/Laptop teaser. Before E3 2020.
-PS Phone/Laptop launch. E3 2020.
OR
-PS4 SS ($199) and Pro S ($349) launch, E3 2017.
-PS4 SS ($199), Pro S Digital ($299), Pro 4k BD ($399). E3 2017.
-PS4 Ultra teasers. Before E3 2018.
-PS4 Ultra launch. E3 2018. (8or12 core Jag, 54cu 6.2Tflop Pitcairn/Polaris, 12gb DDR5(x) ?) ($399).
-PS4 Portable teasers. Before E3 2019. 
-PS4 Portable launch. E3 2019.  ($249)
-PS5 teaser. Before E3 2020.
-PS5 launch. E3 2020. (8 core Zen+, 12Tflop Navi, 16gb HBM3 ?) ($399).
-PS Phone/Laptop teaser. Before E3 2021.
-PS Phone/Laptop launch. E3 2021.

i mean literally none of those things are necessary, Sony can just keep doing what they are doing and will outsell XBO/Scorpio.

Yeah, maybe Microsoft can start to gain some ground in US/UK but globally PS4 is going to dominate XBO no matter what.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.