ClassicGamingWizzz said:
BraLoD said:
Well, 75 is not a bad score, I understand the expectations might once have been higher, based on series score pattern, budget, dev cycle, etc, so yeah, it sounds like a dissapointment, but 75 is not a bad score on itself, as I said, it's still on the green part on Metacritic, it means it's a positive score.
|
Mass Effect - Best metascore 91 on Xbox 360 Mass Effect 2 - Best metascore 94 on Xbox 360 Mass Effect 3 - Best metasocre 93 on Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 Mass Effect Anderomeda - Best metascore 78 on PC
Its not a bad score, its a horrible score lol
These days a 75 game on metacritic is like a 4 / 10 movie in metacritic, or rottentomatos xD
It will probably be the end of this IP, i hope not. a 40 million budget and 5 years, the most they had to make a mass effect game and they done fucked up.
|
No its the opposite. This generation has generally faced far harsher reviewing. It'd be interesting to see some like-for-like statistical analysis across genres, but rated last gen Andromeda would have been several points higher.
Either way as you've said, a drop down for the franchise. I'll still play it day one and hope for the best, but I am pretty devastated.
I doubt it'll be the end of the franchise. This game is after SWTOR as the primary reason EA bought Bioware. Hopefully it'll be just like ME:1. Dream a little too big, then winnow down into a real great experience with the second game. ME2 is when Mass Effect's rep really exploded.