As someone who actually likes to own the games I play it offers me ZERO value... none... at all.
As someone who actually likes to own the games I play it offers me ZERO value... none... at all.
Great value for those that want it, other than 1 or 2 games, I either own them (ME and DA) or am not interested (sports mainly), so not for me but it is good value.
Hmm, pie.
| Nautilus said: Nah.Imagine if every single publisher did that?You would end up paying like(putting PS Plus in this) 30 dollars every month, plus the games. No system like this is ever worth paying, in my opinion. |
I literally see no downside to this. Please explain.
sethnintendo said:
I pray to all the gods that this doesn't happen. I see no reason to pay money just to be able to play a game early. I see value in able to access the older games. EA might as well start hiding game modes behind their pay wall. |
Then don't pay for the trials but for the full games that are already in the vault?
I see them as a bonus and it's not like the trial will vanish once the game comes out next week. They are still available in a few months, so every future EA Access user will have the chance to try the game until it will be included in the vault by the end of the year (probably).
d21lewis said:
I literally see no downside to this. Please explain. |
Me neither. $30 a month for every single game on the platform would be an insane deal.
That's the equivalent of 6 full priced games a year. Sign me up!
d21lewis said:
I literally see no downside to this. Please explain. |
There are none, if you have have tons of money in your bank and like burning them.
In no realistic scenario you would use the maximum you could of each service(remembering that some services offers free games) and still have the time and buy all the games(and finish them) that you want.And that dosent even include your daily routine or obligations.And thats not to include the fact that, assuming the amount of money I said is correct, you could basically buy 6 launch games in a year.
One or two services are fine, but more than that is just wasting money on something you will barely use.And that could be better spent elsewhere.
My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.
https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1
I just don't like subscription services. Nothing personal EA.
These services are pointless. Unless you actually play every single game, that's on the service. And never stop playing them. Because the time off, is just wasting money. The same with Amazon Prime. Unless you buy stuff weekly. Than you lose money. You pay for access for games. Why not just buy the games you want. Pay once. And not a monthly fee. Second: Early access. This use to be free. As a thing called a demo.
This is the bad logic Elite Dangerous does. I paid for all the expansions, for the 2.0 updates. But, I can't use the beta of the commander update. You gotta pay for that. Assinine. I paid, in advance, for all the updates. And that's not good enough.
Why is having to pay for a time limited demo seen as value?