BINGO!!! :D

But yeah, you're right! I'm kind of compulsive with this kind of ***t to be honest! It's like, I know I shouldn't care about it but then I see those numbers and the differences staring at me in the face and I just cannot help but to highlight this. 

But you are indeed right, I should just let it go. I know, for me personally, that Horizon is a work of art that should get every high praise that it DID get from noteworthy critics. And thank god for that. These developers at GG are highly skilled for what they have crafted here. I'll leave it to the gamers to decide. Let's hope it breaks 2 million copies on launch day. That is what I'd like to see.

All the reviews do is reinforce how legendary Zelda is. If you can play both games and appreciate them like you say you can then stop letting a Metascore bother you. The only tragedy is how much you are letting this bother you.

If nostalgia was a playing factor nowadays, sonic alongside many other old franchises like bomberman would still be relevant and getting high scores, which didn't, just accept the game is good and stop embarassing yourself with this horizon vs zelda, the more you post, the clearer it is too see you didn't play zelda at all and it's salty cause of the praise the game it's getting.

Why care what Meta says? Seriously why care? Also I can't accept HZD because how clueless the devs are on Native cultures  and follow the trend of whitewashing  in games.

i don't know why MOD is closing my thread while letting this one alive?

here from my last thread

It might gotten lower than 88 rating it currently sitting at metacitic/opencritic/gameranking with the final impression of both series by major gaming media and website.
Here a few list of what major press like IGN,gamespot,gameinformer and kotaku talk about the major differences between two that should put HZD to lower than it currently at.

-Scripted world compared to more dynamic BOTW world

-Interactivity in HZD world is minimal compared to BOTW vast world interaction

-Turn off your brain and go from point A to point B because there's nothing happen in between unlike BOTW
where you can go straight from point A to point Z and ignoring completely point B,C,D,E and so on.
-Melee combat is shallow with only one type of weapon

-Stealth section is laughable with completely dismissing noise detection mechanics compared to Zelda BOTW

-Minimal combat approach needed in HZD against Zelda BOTW dynamic approaches with Terrain,weather,physics,weapon,wild animal and a lot more ways to defeats your opponent

-Human AI

my prediction if HZD has been reviewed after BOTW it's probably gonna end up the same metascore as The last Guardian, ok game that come every year and nothing revolutionary about that compared to BOTW game of the generation or perhaps Game of all time candidate with open world perfection it brings to the gaming industry.

And you could say the exact opposite, too. That since the reviewers were already familiar with Horizon, that they were more impressed with Zelda than they would have been.

If nostalgia was a playing factor nowadays, sonic alongside many other old franchises like bomberman would still be relevant and getting high scores, which didn't, just accept the game is good and stop embarassing yourself with this horizon vs zelda, the more you post, the clearer it is too see you didn't play zelda at all and it's salty cause of the praise the game is getting.

it doesn't work like that, they even playing horizon zero dawn back after playing zelda and the result? more shallow gameplay experience like what in gameinformer , vice gaming and gamespot said in their podcast.

so you letting this one go because he is stating his own opinions while i cannot do the same when i have major press and website that backup my statement about the score?

cherry-picking much? 

I can see Zelda outselling Horizon but i dont think Switch launch will match PS4s.