By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Should I Get This Car? UPDATED

 

Should I get the BMW?

Yes, it sounds like a good deal 5 10.87%
 
Eh, be careful, it sounds pretty sketchy 8 17.39%
 
No! It sounds like a scam 16 34.78%
 
It's too shady to be cer... 17 36.96%
 
Total:46

I'll chime in since I'm a past BMW owner (2007 E90 3 series).

It's a fun car in your 20s, not going to lie, and it can sometimes help seal the deal with a girl. Not going to lie on that either.

But an out of warranty BMW ... especially a RWD one when you have to drive in snow? Nuh uh OP, stay away. The costs for getting it fixed as it starts to age will be like $2000-$3000 sometimes per visit to the body shop, and oh yes, their eyes light up when they see you have a German sports car because they know they're going to bend you over on the bill.


I'd pass. As many other posters have said if you're getting a 6+ year used vehicle go for a Japanese brand. Toyota, Honda, etc. 

It sounds like you're also getting conned by the car dealer. If that's the car you want, I'd rather shop around for your own and buy on your own terms, never accept something when you're cornered like that for a "great deal". 



Around the Network

If you're pressed for money, a used BMW is one of the worst things you can buy. Even routine maintenance like oil changes and brakes are expensive. 1998-2008 Corollas are bullet proof, there are countless videos on youtube of owners getting 300,000+ miles with original engines and transmissions. Yes they're a bore to drive, but they're the epitome of reliable transportation



@Netyaroze: Daihatsu always was reliable.
Drove a Mira/Cuore L701 for 222.192KM and an L276 for 119.600 until some idiot crashed in our little car.
NO issues while some of the 'reliable' german cars really had critical problems.

Especially newer VW engines...

@Starocean:
Front wheel drive or maybe all wheel drive, something releiable and, if you don't want to spend a lot of money over the time, get something 'cheap' and reliable.



Sounds like a lot of trouble to get a car... you are better off with a bycicle.



"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"

captain carot said:
@Netyaroze: Daihatsu always was reliable.
Drove a Mira/Cuore L701 for 222.192KM and an L276 for 119.600 until some idiot crashed in our little car.
NO issues while some of the 'reliable' german cars really had critical problems.

Especially newer VW engines...

@Starocean:
Front wheel drive or maybe all wheel drive, something releiable and, if you don't want to spend a lot of money over the time, get something 'cheap' and reliable.

Well I can tell you that I am driving Mercs and Audis for the past 10 years. Many KM approximatly 75k per year. And I had not once a technical issue. (well an out of the ordinary issue)



Around the Network
Netyaroze said:
bonzobanana said:
Good site here;

http://www.reliabilityindex.com/manufacturer

It's from a uk perspective but has zero bias or opinion its statistics based on which models and brands fail and cost and frequency of repair for the insurance company. It's why getting BMW warranty insurance is a lot more than Toyota. As you will see the Japanese brands come top and German brands make up most of the bottom with the top ten of most unreliable models dominated by German cars. Luxury and performance makes for a more complicated car which unless your a Lexus model means expense. Lets not forget a money pit of a car can really effect your lifestyle if a lot of your money is going to keeping such a car on the road plus all the higher costs of insurance etc.

I'm old enough to remember when German cars used to be as reliable as the Japanese models but its been many years since that was true. Nowadays its still Japanese brands with the Korean's probably in distant second place.





Those stats dont give you the full picture. First of they include cost of repair. Which obviously is extremly high for Bentley and Porsche. Those brands are not made for people without money. So it does not tell you where those brands would rank without the cost factor. Still could be more reliable technically but a small thing will cost you thousands.

Also Frequency of failures. The question is what exactly constitutes as failure. If for example the media screen in a mercedes on the rear left seat starts flickering. Is that considered a failure ?

Logically a Daihatsu has way less technology in it that can fail. If the steering wheel of a merc stops vibrating if you touch the white divide line it is a failure. If the hot stone massage seats dont massage properly anymore its a failure. Or if a sensor stops working out of the dozends that are in a Merc. 

Ofcourse a Daihatsu will have the better ranking. Because it has none of these things in the first place and since its a simpler car. The mechanics there do not have to know as much as a Merc Mechanic and it will be cheaper. 

Luxury cars are for people who have money to spare. And in return they get Luxury. 

But I agree that the OP should not get this car as he is unable to assess the situation correctly and still did not tell which model he is actually refering to.

 

It's not hiding that information. I think most of us would realise that by the information they give describing how the statistics are calculated. There is more information available on this site allowing you to break down the data into more detail about frequency of failures and what is  going wrong etc.

Many brands are directly comparable though based on a similar range of models and pricing.

Models like Lexus shows that luxury, performance and reasonable running costs is possible. 

Some cars just don't age very well, they are almost designed to fail outside warranty and dare I say it but many German cars seem to be designed that way.

You can buy a Mazda MX-5 which is an awesome little sports car you can throw around corners and massive fun and still super reliable with very low running costs.

I'd rather have an extra holiday, a few more games consoles or a better tv and surround system than pay out for a car with expensive running costs. I saw a BMW driver waiting for road side assistance once with the bonnet up speaking to someone on his mobile. He looked as red as a human being can possibly be and was obviously massively stressed for the few seconds I saw him while driving past. Breakdown's are far more common with performance and luxury cars unless you have a very old car which is simply worn out. I'll chose a  car that makes breakdowns less likely as a priority over brand snobbery. 



Player2 said:
FunFan said:

All the american brands at the bottom. Snoopy is screwed.

Well. Its not a law. The most reliable car is a well maintained car. But some cars are much harder and pricey to keep in top shape. Queue the german brands like BMW.



“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).

"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)

bonzobanana said:
Netyaroze said:

Those stats dont give you the full picture. First of they include cost of repair. Which obviously is extremly high for Bentley and Porsche. Those brands are not made for people without money. So it does not tell you where those brands would rank without the cost factor. Still could be more reliable technically but a small thing will cost you thousands.

Also Frequency of failures. The question is what exactly constitutes as failure. If for example the media screen in a mercedes on the rear left seat starts flickering. Is that considered a failure ?

Logically a Daihatsu has way less technology in it that can fail. If the steering wheel of a merc stops vibrating if you touch the white divide line it is a failure. If the hot stone massage seats dont massage properly anymore its a failure. Or if a sensor stops working out of the dozends that are in a Merc. 

Ofcourse a Daihatsu will have the better ranking. Because it has none of these things in the first place and since its a simpler car. The mechanics there do not have to know as much as a Merc Mechanic and it will be cheaper. 

Luxury cars are for people who have money to spare. And in return they get Luxury. 

But I agree that the OP should not get this car as he is unable to assess the situation correctly and still did not tell which model he is actually refering to.

 

It's not hiding that information. I think most of us would realise that by the information they give describing how the statistics are calculated. There is more information available on this site allowing you to break down the data into more detail about frequency of failures and what is  going wrong etc.

Many brands are directly comparable though based on a similar range of models and pricing.

Models like Lexus shows that luxury, performance and reasonable running costs is possible. 

Some cars just don't age very well, they are almost designed to fail outside warranty and dare I say it but many German cars seem to be designed that way.

You can buy a Mazda MX-5 which is an awesome little sports car you can throw around corners and massive fun and still super reliable with very low running costs.

I'd rather have an extra holiday, a few more games consoles or a better tv and surround system than pay out for a car with expensive running costs. I saw a BMW driver waiting for road side assistance once with the bonnet up speaking to someone on his mobile. He looked as red as a human being can possibly be and was obviously massively stressed for the few seconds I saw him while driving past. Breakdown's are far more common with performance and luxury cars unless you have a very old car which is simply worn out. I'll chose a  car that makes breakdowns less likely as a priority over brand snobbery. 

Well I understand. I would also not sacrifice anything to drive a german car. I drove Lexus and really the E and S Class looks, feels, drives better in my opinion.

I understand that cars like the MX5 (eventhough the new ones are not light anymore) are good cars. But I hate the stereotypes that come with driving german brands. I am neither a snob nor do I try to impress anyone. I just prefer the comfortable ride the features and the haptics of a Merc and I dont have to sacrifice anything in my life to afford it so there is no reason not to have one. 

I also dont understand why some people think Mercs and Audis are unreliable. Maybe I am just exceptionally lucky and get always perfect ones. 



BMWs usually don't just "break down", that part of it I'd say is kinda bunk. I've had my E90 since 2007 for example and it runs fine, it's just gone into "retirement" in my garage. I've had it "break down" once and I bought it brand new so over a decade ago. But the maintainence costs can be high, anything that needs to be fixed over time (and there will be a bunch of stuff) is going to cost 2x-3x a non-luxury vehicle.



Good job getting out of it. If you can afford a $5k car, and have credit that is 600+, like you mentioned, you can deal with reputable people.