fordy said:
Hapuc12 said:
You do know that PS4/Xbox sales all come from third party just a little from Hardware
I am deadset Nintendo to not expand there base is because.
1 Competition:Everything relies on competition,no competition no industry to expand.
2 Broken/Expensive games:Without the first reason there would be no incentive to make amazing games and try new things because there would be no "first reason"
3: Jobs/Sectors that will be lost:Nintendo will have to fire of shit ton of people and close a lot of studios which would be terrible.
Nintendo has there own Software,hardware,accesories,amibos etc etc to make,and they have incentive to keep there software on there own hardware.
Uncharted 4 proved that exclusives are amazing if they are bundled right and boom revenue 500 mil revenue to be precise.
|
1. Nintendo started off with no competition. By your logic between points 1 and 2, they'd have gone down with the rest of the game companies in the crash. Nintendo survived and thrived because of their business model, not because of competition.
2. See point 1. After the crash, that didn't stop Nintendo from producing quality games, despite no competition.
3. You can't argue for a bad business model because of redundancies. Do you ever expect Nintendo to be successful anymore, or slowly start to drift into debt from an abundance of redundant workers?
Correction, Nintendo have their own hardware THAT'S A SMALL PORTION OF THE MARKET. There's a NEGATIVE incentive to keep their software on it. I have explained this before.
Wrong. The fact that a game is limited to one console is not what constitutes it as being great. That's a very illogical statement right there.
|
Yes without competition.
And in monopoly Nintendo dictated how the games were made when to release them how much cut they can take,too much power for a company that no one should have which you seem to can't comprehend.
Crash i didn't say anything about the crash,Nintendo had the monopoly since 84 to about 95 when the PS1 was introduced did you see how much games were produced,PS1 got 4-5 games monthly while Nintendo got like 1-2 in 3-4 months.
Bad bussiness is when you have the monopoly like i said.
They make there own hardware and they make there own software for there hardware to support it.
It's not my problem it's not Nintendos Problem it's not Anyones problem,because you are from the looks of things Socialist and you would like everyone to play on anything which would kill the whole business and would render the industry reduntend.
What would motivate Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft to make games when all the games can be played on anything.
I like exclusivity because I know that the console or anything i bought is being supported by the Company and it gives the incentive for other costumers to buy that console.