People are just now realizing this? Slow fucks.

I know for a fact that I am not the only member on here that uses a projector pimarily.

I also didn't see the need to have to explain this because i didn't think i would have had to even justify why I think its important that a console that is designed to be used on a TV (if you want) should allow you be able to charge your controllers while playing on the TV instead of keeping that option behind a paywall.... which is what this is. If anything I only recently got a 4k TV for my PS4pro and thats because good 4k projectors are still way out of my price bracket.

And a setup like this isn't anywhere near as expensive as you may imagine. For eg, you cpuld get a 1080p projector and a 110" electric projector screen for under $1000. Or you can make you own screen and save money. 

here are some pics of the first prjector i got or rather its image on a screen I made. Thats a 92" screen and the whole thing cost me $750..... about 5 yrs ago. This was also in my old apartment. My current setup is a loooot better than this and this time i bought a screen (just less hassle) two of those pics is with the lights on and one is with the lights off.

So Nintendo is not charging $30 more for the starting price by not including something that 99% of people would never NEED to use and makes that item available for the 1% that just can't put the thing down for a couple of hours and people are mad and say they are evil money grubbers? But they don't say anything about an included HDMI cable nobody really needs that could lower the price $10...

Another day, another obvious thing Nintendo should have done, but doesn't is excused.  My guess is if the online is just as poor as the Wii U's, but Nintendo decides to charge $50 for it, with nothing but NES games to give in return, it will be excused by the same people, as well.

Nickel-and-diming us...

The Joycons are 80 not 110

Arms is played like this:

Nintendo could charge $600 for the console and it would still be excused, with "$600 is worth it to play the Wii U Zelda but in slightly better conditions". 

Of course being unable to charge while playing is unacceptable in 2017. I already had this issue once, with my Wiimote and the rechargeable battery I had, and it's awful not being able to play when you have time because you forgot to charge it beforehand.

But hey, like when you were not supposed to be able to play the Xbox One when not connected to Internet once a day, it's the consumer's fault for not preparing his gaming sessions properly, right? 

I guess it will charge it 

I know that.  What I meant was if you want to have a complete 2nd controller. You can either get the Pro conroller or JoyCons + charge grip.  For the option of playing games like ARMS you'd want the latter.

Unless you play for 20 hours consecutively, there really is no point for the charging grip in my opinion.

if I were to ever get another grip, it'd probably be the $10 grip that doesn't charge. It's cheaper and does exactly the same thing. If I want to charge the joycons, I can always snap it onto the switch or just get the more convenient charging base.