By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Laura Dale rumor: Assassin's Creed 2017 is coming to the Switch

Random_Matt on 29 December 2016

They ran like crap on the Wii U, wonder if Ubi will bother with the Switch port this time.



Around the Network
JRPGfan on 29 December 2016
onionberry said:
bananaking21 said:
if this is true, then good bye for a hope that the next assassins creed would be worth a damn. if they want to regain interest in the series, dont limit it by making their next game have to run on a .15 teraflop device. use the power that the PS4 and XB1 consoles have to create an epic world.

Do you know about scalability? Cause that's a very ignorant point of view. You know that you can play a game with different settings on PC for a reason, and that the witcher 3 looks like crap on consoles compared to ultra settings on PC? You can expect the same game on switch with a lower resolution and less detail, but portable.

Be honest... differnce isnt that big.

Even on ultra PC settings vs the normal PS4.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUtquPxjp7w

I wouldnt say it looks like crap on PS4 and then amasing on PC... because thats simply not true, the differnce really isnt that great.

 

PC UTLTRA:  http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/7/5/6/6/2/1/PC_007.bmp.jpg/EG11/quality/90/format/jpg

PS3 : http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/7/5/6/6/2/1/PS4_007.bmp.jpg/EG11/quality/90/format/jpg

 

These are not huge differnces... .where one looks like crap, ect



onionberry on 29 December 2016

Not third party support? Buuuu doomed
Third party support? Buuu it's going to limit the other consoles(nonsense)

I'm waiting for the next creative complaint



bananaking21 on 29 December 2016
onionberry said:
bananaking21 said:
if this is true, then good bye for a hope that the next assassins creed would be worth a damn. if they want to regain interest in the series, dont limit it by making their next game have to run on a .15 teraflop device. use the power that the PS4 and XB1 consoles have to create an epic world.

Do you know about scalability? Cause that's a very ignorant point of view. You know that you can play a game with different settings on PC for a reason, and that the witcher 3 looks like crap on consoles compared to ultra settings on PC? You can expect the same game on switch with a lower resolution and less detail, but portable.

im not talking about graphics, im talking about the game itself. there comes a point where lowering resolution and AA wont cut it, and the hardware is too week to run the game. 



KLXVER on 29 December 2016

Would rather have a game with actual gameplay. Rayman Legends 2 would be great.



Around the Network
onionberry on 29 December 2016
JRPGfan said:
onionberry said:

Do you know about scalability? Cause that's a very ignorant point of view. You know that you can play a game with different settings on PC for a reason, and that the witcher 3 looks like crap on consoles compared to ultra settings on PC? You can expect the same game on switch with a lower resolution and less detail, but portable.

Be honest... differnce isnt that big.

Even on ultra PC settings vs the normal PS4.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUtquPxjp7w

I wouldnt say it looks like crap on PS4 and then amasing on PC... because thats simply not true, the differnce really isnt that great.

Yeah its great when in one console is running at a lower resolution, the other at 1080p, both with framerate dips at 30fps and less detail. Yet, i play that game with ultra settings, 4k and 60 fps, see? The console version is not limiting how I can play that game on pc.



JRPGfan on 29 December 2016
onionberry said:
JRPGfan said:

Be honest... differnce isnt that big.

Even on ultra PC settings vs the normal PS4.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUtquPxjp7w

- video was here -

I wouldnt say it looks like crap on PS4 and then amasing on PC... because thats simply not true, the differnce really isnt that great.

Yeah its great when in one console is running at a lower resolution, the other at 1080p, both with framerate dips at 30fps and less detail. Yet, i play that game with ultra settings, 4k and 60 fps, see? The console version is not limiting how I can play that game on pc.

When you say "one looks like crap" the other doesnt.

What does fps have to do with it, your talking about visually the image quality is differnt.

Im saying its really not that big.

Look at this:

PC : http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/7/5/6/6/2/1/PC_007.bmp.jpg/EG11/quality/90/format/jpg

vs

PS4: http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/7/5/6/6/2/1/PS4_007.bmp.jpg/EG11/quality/90/format/jpg



onionberry on 29 December 2016
bananaking21 said:
onionberry said:

Do you know about scalability? Cause that's a very ignorant point of view. You know that you can play a game with different settings on PC for a reason, and that the witcher 3 looks like crap on consoles compared to ultra settings on PC? You can expect the same game on switch with a lower resolution and less detail, but portable.

im not talking about graphics, im talking about the game itself. there comes a point where lowering resolution and AA wont cut it, and the hardware is too week to run the game. 

Hmmm still don't agree man, I mean, look at gta v on pc and gta v on xbox 360. It's not like the switch is gameboy, you can expect the same games with less detail. And is not like you can do much with the hardware of the one and ps4. Sure, if the game was an exclusive by ND on ps4 I would understand, but the game is a third party game that needs to run on different systems and settings. 



HintHRO on 29 December 2016

And it will be the only AC coming to Switch



onionberry on 29 December 2016
JRPGfan said:
onionberry said:

Yeah its great when in one console is running at a lower resolution, the other at 1080p, both with framerate dips at 30fps and less detail. Yet, i play that game with ultra settings, 4k and 60 fps, see? The console version is not limiting how I can play that game on pc.

When you say "one looks like crap" the other doesnt.

What does fps have to do with it, your talking about visually the image quality is differnt.

Im saying its really not that big.

Look at this:

PC : http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/7/5/6/6/2/1/PC_007.bmp.jpg/EG11/quality/90/format/jpg

vs

PS4: http://images.eurogamer.net/2013/articles//a/1/7/5/6/6/2/1/PS4_007.bmp.jpg/EG11/quality/90/format/jpg

The point is scalability, if you try to run the witcher 3 that I play on a ps4 it would destroy the console, yet, you can play the same game on ps4 with less details, resolution and framerate, and that version is not limiting the pc version. Settings and scalability is something that every engine has, so "one version is limiting the other" is nonsense. You can develop the same game to run on a ps4 or on a vita.