Yes, I'd agree that it got the ball rolling and I'm with you 100% on there being a lynch toDay. I was thinking you may just rest on your laurels after that vote, but I'm not too worried about that. I think your alignment is one of the easiest to read, and I believe you'd concur.

It sure was! Without spoiling anything for others, I really liked that it was definitely a Star Wars film, but it also felt very unique from the main episodes.

3 mafiosi without a SK would mean mafia need 5 mislynches(or 4 plus a no lynch) for a win to town only needing 3 succesful lynches.

I'd lean towards the 4-man team(a race to 4 lynches) or 3+SK again as others have suggested.

If I was somehow lynched toDay, I would think scum would have to flail pretty hard to get it done, so it'd out them pretty easily. But in that case one of them would be lynched toDay instead of me, so I can't properly answer your question.

Rather I could say what we would lose from lynching me toDay. One of town's more active members, that is good at prodding others for responses, and looks back through the thread meticulously when new information comes to light such that I'm pretty good at checking out a townie's claim or knocking out scummates like dominos once one is confirmed.

I still fully think this is what mafia want and getting a read on anyone when people are so haphazardly voting to lynch is going to be more difficult in later rounds. I think a shot in the dark the first day is pretty damn risky.

I agree that just voting to lynch for the sake of it and then bandwagonning for reason is scummy behavior. Those would be the first people I'd suspect and the first people I'd target for lynching. Basing votes off previous games at least is somehow providing reasoning.

Both Trucks and Prof voted zero immediately, I'd like to hear your reason for doing it so soon when it could easily screw the town.

Of course, at least with night roles doing their jobs for town you'd somehow have information that could lead to a potential target. This is just creating a scenario that the mafia want to happen. In this situation anyone could play the part of town. However I'm speaking in generalities and not basing this off of previous behavior from the other players. Best we can do is hope for a slip up from a mafia member.

Do you disagree? I say it's too early to say definitively. He hasn't exhibited the type of odd logic that I called him out for last time as scum, but the push for zero isn't really scumhunting either.

Night roles won't necessarily get any useful information though, and until there's a successful lynch mafia gain more sway over the voting as town's numbers dwindle. My point being it can just as easy if not moreso for mafia to take advantage of the cacophony for a lynch in later Days also.

A Day One lynch is certain to provide information. If it's a mislynch we can question weak votes or if the case against the lynchee was actually pretty strong look at those who seemed to steer away from the lynch as if they knew the flip would turn up town. For a succesful lynch we can look at people that tried too hard to be on the lynch or put up weak reasons to look elsewhere. All good starting points in case Night roles come up empty or want to conceal their roles further in hopes of gaining more time. Additionally, it reduces the suspect pool, which has several benefits.

Why do you say it will be hard to get a read on anyone? We should be questioning haphazardly voting as it occurs, which you seem to be attempting to do. I agree a random lynch would be unwise, but nobody is advovcating that.

Why didn't you address my last reply to you?

I'll do you the favor of spelling out the point I've been trying to get across though. If you want to draw a parallel to last game, then you should be saying Trucks is probably town that is mistakingly pushing for a mislynch. Or at least you could make the argument that Trucks saw how nobody was getting questioned for focusing on Mr.P, so he's trying to escape scrutiny now with his focus on you. Right now you are saying both town and mafia had weak reasons to call Mr.P scum last game, therefore Trucks is scum. It's weak reasoning on your part.

Also, while mislynching Mr.P was what ultimately led to town's loss not lynching him day one was the biggest contribution to the loss. That kind of mistake needs to happen as early as possible, not at mylo. To put that in terms for this game, if there is going to be a focus on you as a liability until you are dead, then you should indeed by lynched now instead of dragging it out. If you are town, you can and should try to show that you aren't actually a liability.

You make some good points. I think it would just be rather easy for mafia to play differently or side with town to blend in, and perhaps throw their teammates under the bus, which is a strategy that could throw town off.

I suppose a lynch that could provide some information is better than no lynch at all. Based on my gut, and the fact that he was the first lynch vote with no actual reasoning and it just seems fairly random.

Vote: Trucks

How are you bucking the trend? Up until FF, nobody actually said anything about zero being scummy, and nobody has after either.

Did you mean to unvote with this statement by the way, or were you on board as a policy lynch so this revelation about his alignment has no bearing anyway?

What you are describing is an Open Setup.

I think Noctis was asking you how many members are on your scumteam.