sw numbers up, looks like gt5 is undertracked heavily.
1 million retailer pre-orders with some sell outs across EU and it only sells 374k?
doubt it
sw numbers up, looks like gt5 is undertracked heavily.
1 million retailer pre-orders with some sell outs across EU and it only sells 374k?
doubt it
massiveley undertracked.
although u have to remeber: it was available for download
do downloads count for official sale numbers?
Really, unless you have actual evidence, don't claim a game is over or under tracked. There is no point as it's only your opinion and not based on any facts.
ssj12 said:
nope, 400k |
lol
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=42157
You must really love GT5P to think it would push 400k consoles in Others. Between all three consoles, that feet has only been done twice LTD (and one was by the PS3).
360 held well.
PS3 did very well.
Most PS3 fans on this site expected it to do 150k-200k, so I think its safe to say it failed to meet expectations.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
we also know it sold over 100k in the UK, so it sold almost 1/3 of its total in one region? again, doubtful
| FishyJoe said: Really, unless you have actual evidence, don't claim a game is over or under tracked. There is no point as it's only your opinion and not based on any facts. |
o ok.
| starcraft said: 360 held well. PS3 did very well. Most PS3 fans on this site expected it to do 150k-200k, so I think its safe to say it failed to meet expectations. |
can you make one post in a ps3 thread without your constant subtle trolling? seriously.
| FishyJoe said: Really, unless you have actual evidence, don't claim a game is over or under tracked. There is no point as it's only your opinion and not based on any facts. |
i agree - ppl always use that excuse when #'s don't come out the way they like
| BCNR34 said: we also know it sold over 100k in the UK, so it sold almost 1/3 of its total in one region? again, doubtful |
First of all your math is bad, 100k is only about 27% of the total. Second, that is well within normal range for UK percentage of others. Third, most of your analysis is based on assumption rather than hard facts.