By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Rumour: Splatoon packed with Switch, new 3D Mario and Skyrim on launch, Mario Kart 8 remaster..

Wright said:
KLXVER said:

I dont try to justify it having a lackluster launch lineup. You are the one that takes a rumor to mean its shitty and that consoles has to have several games you want to play because it wont get anything for several months after launch. Lots of assuming there for something not confirmed by any means.

And at which part of these conclussions you missed all the times I said "I'm giving Nintendo the benefit of doubt"...? Or you just went straight to argue and disregarded this?

Are you giving them the benefit of the doubt? Because arguing with me several times after you said it tells me different. The only thing I was asking is why do you care how many games a console have at launch? It could have 4 at launch and 20 the week after for all we know. Stop acting like the launch day is the only relevant day to a console for the first 6 months.



Around the Network
KLXVER said:

Are you giving them the benefit of the doubt? Because arguing with me several times after you said it tells me different. The only thing I was asking is why do you care how many games a console have at launch? It could have 4 at launch and 20 the week after for all we know. Stop acting like the launch day is the only relevant day to a console for the first 6 months.

You are the one that keep arguing about me arguing with people saying that just Mario and ports was a decent lineup day one, so at no point that changed, including the fact that I give Nintendo the benefit of doubt (Because more games coming wasn't never the point I argued in the first place). It's not my fault if you totally miss the point and disregard things I've said, or the arguments I gave those other people.

And since me giving me the benefit of doubt of Nintendo remained unchanged throughout, you stop acting like you have any clue what the conversation was or what the points were, because you clearly don't.



Wright said:
KLXVER said:

Are you giving them the benefit of the doubt? Because arguing with me several times after you said it tells me different. The only thing I was asking is why do you care how many games a console have at launch? It could have 4 at launch and 20 the week after for all we know. Stop acting like the launch day is the only relevant day to a console for the first 6 months.

You are the one that keep arguing about me arguing with people saying that just Mario and ports was a decent lineup day one, so at no point that changed, including the fact that I give Nintendo the benefit of doubt (Because more games coming wasn't never the point I argued in the first place). It's not my fault if you totally miss the point and disregard things I've said, or the arguments I gave those other people.

And since me giving me the benefit of doubt of Nintendo remained unchanged throughout, you stop acting like you have any clue what the conversation was or what the points were, because you clearly don't.

Our conversation started when I quoted you. Nothing of what you said before or to other people is relevant.



59 days to go... =(



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

WagnerPaiva said:
59 days to go... =(

Yeah, its not as easy as I thought it would be.lol



Around the Network
Miyamotoo said:
Pavolink said:

At launch. Yes, that's impressive and counts. I have explained several times that the launch of the Wii was gamers buying it for Zelda. Only the launch. Mainstream then entered. If they have sold Wii Sports as a standalone game I can bet you and anyone TP would have outsold.

 

And by launch I mean launch. Not first month or lifetime. Only launch.

 

 

Zelda, a game that must have been released a year ago and a bunch of ports does not make an impressive launch. But the rest sounds good. Pikmin 4, 3D Mario and new IP. Retro has a lot to prove after the 2D DK to be considered as an exciting game.

Fact that Zelda was an schedule to release year ago really doesn't change anything, it will be must have game and reason to own Switch in any case.

That's the problem. It should be a Wii U must have, not a Switch one.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


KLXVER said:

Our conversation started when I quoted you. Nothing of what you said before or to other people is relevant.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8153374

You quoted me while I was giving arguments to some other people of what I just said, and that's the train of logic you choose to keep up. You disregarded things and went straight to argue and missed the point. So no, everything prior to it isn't irrelevant, especially not because you say so, and it's even worse when the things were back to its original track in quotes in posts AFTER that quote you said everything after means nothing:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8153385

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8153387

You keep missing the point even now. You should really stop at this point.



Switch+3D Mario for launch would be lovely. I'll definitely get that bundle if true.



Mario is enough for me. I would have liked to have Zelda instead but... I guess this is okay. There has to be more though. They're going to have a huge reveal on Jan 12th, I'd imagine there'd be much more at the show from Square Enix (probably Dragon Quest XI and X), something from Capcom, etc. I'm sure this is just the tip of the iceberg. Kimishima seems adamant on making Switch's launch a success, it sounds like they're on track.



Wright said:
KLXVER said:

Our conversation started when I quoted you. Nothing of what you said before or to other people is relevant.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8153374

You quoted me while I was giving arguments to some other people of what I just said, and that's the train of logic you choose to keep up. You disregarded things and went straight to argue and missed the point. So no, everything prior to it isn't irrelevant, especially not because you say so, and it's even worse when the things were back to its original track in quotes in posts AFTER that quote you said everything after means nothing:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8153385

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8153387

You keep missing the point even now. You should really stop at this point.

I am going to stop. You wont answer my question anyway, so its just meaningless back and forth at this point.