By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Mafia Round 74 -Overwatch Theme

axumblade said:
Sorry for my inactivity in the game today. I have a pretty bad case of the flu and instead of resting last night, my dumbass decided to make my most wanted thread. I'll try to be more present in here tomorrow.

I hope you're feeling better, we could certainly use your thoughts. Have you gotten a chance to read through the posts toDay such that you'd like to lynch Mr.P again? If not, would you care to join the Clyde or darwin lynches or should someone else hang today?



Around the Network
Linkzmax said:

If you are saying prof made up the claim and Clyde is his scummate, how does that explain the SK slip?

Shit, nevermind. The logic doesn't hold up after some thought. I unintentionally made a couple of false assumptions earlier.



Did you get a chance to read Clyde, axum? Thoughts?



axumblade said:
miz1q2w3e said:

lol, Stefl.

Anyways, how about we just all pick our top 5 to vote, and we'll do an alternative vote.

Mine:
1- Clyde
2- Darwin
3- Mr.P
4- prof
5- axum

That is a really dumb idea. If we all vote for the people we think are most likely to be mafia, wouldn't that just give those in the mafia an opportunity to wait and then shift the vote in whatever direction they would like? I don't trust that idea at all. I do, for the record, think that you are town. But I feel that your idea is not the best one.

As for other users, I still don't necessarily trust Mr.P being a town bulletproof or that theprof conveniently stole his powers. As I've stated before, theprof seems to be following.

I'm interested in the fact that I'm on some of you guys "potential scum list?"

Agree with the underlined, but not really sure what you mean by the bolded.

I think the reason is pretty obvious, but I'll let people answer for themselves. I have a slight town lean on you myself if that's worth anything.



axumblade said:

That is a really dumb idea. If we all vote for the people we think are most likely to be mafia, wouldn't that just give those in the mafia an opportunity to wait and then shift the vote in whatever direction they would like? I don't trust that idea at all. I do, for the record, think that you are town. But I feel that your idea is not the best one.

As for other users, I still don't necessarily trust Mr.P being a town bulletproof or that theprof conveniently stole his powers. As I've stated before, theprof seems to be following.

I'm interested in the fact that I'm on some of you guys "potential scum list?"

It's no different from 'first past the post' in terms of an individual's influence. Mafia can vote either way, you know.

Say for example everyone thought prof was kinda scummy, but felt they needed to vote for one of the main candidates in order to get the game going. An alternative vote is able to satisfy the greatest number of voters.



Around the Network
axumblade said:

Vote: Darwin

2. Today, you said that you have a scum lean on theprof yet you don't vote for him. Meanwhile, you voted for Mr.P despite the fact that you believed him to be town. (of course I get to these points of conversation right after when I am about to post this...) 

This one could be that he does indeed think Prof is a dangerous player(Earlier in the game Prof said the only time he's ever called this is in the mafia chat), and wants someone else to lead a lynch as to not be at the forefront of it. 

Him saying Mr. P is innocent yet still voting for him is probably him trying to get a [*]hard town read. Assuming this is true, Mr. P flips town and he can say something along the lines of "I knew he was town". 

I believe this is the same reason he dropped me from his lynch candidates entirely. Most of my posts point toward me being scum. There is literally no way he could know that I was town unless he was scum and he knew I wasn't on his team. 

*By hard town read I mean a difficult read that ends up being correct. I've seen it used by noob scum before as an attempt to gain credibility by being correct in their reads. Were he a more experienced player the odds of him doing this are less likely, but if he insists on pulling the noob card, I insist on reading him like a noob.



As for you being on a bunch of scum lists: What do you expect, Lurky McLurkson?

As for me, I never said I thought you were scummy per se, but I wouldn't mind lynching you anyway.



miz1q2w3e said:
As for you being on a bunch of scum lists: What do you expect, Lurky McLurkson?

As for me, I never said I thought you were scummy per se, but I wouldn't mind lynching you anyway.

Is this one pointed toward me? 

If so, I got exactly what I expected.



Clyde32 said:
miz1q2w3e said:
As for you being on a bunch of scum lists: What do you expect, Lurky McLurkson?

As for me, I never said I thought you were scummy per se, but I wouldn't mind lynching you anyway.

Is this one pointed toward me? 

If so, I got exactly what I expected.

Sorry, you ninja'd my post :p

It was aimed at axum.



axumblade said:

I feel like the scum might hold off and wait until the end to cast their vote. But, as miz pointed out just now, it's essentially the same as mafia trying to bandwagon on a townie.

As for my view on Clyde, day 1 theprof said he was certain Clyde had a killing role. The end of the day, he made an ominous statement. A lot of his posts are filler posts until they are aimed at someone other than himself.

Actually that was Day 2 where prof said that.