Chazore said:
If the second Titanfall has tiny numbers on all 3 platforms, then that is very dire indeed. What people get from enjoyment is not in the quantity of servers.
Making it so other games cannot be mentioned, does not make a good argument. It's actually trifling to just pin down 3 games and then pin a single platform and say "wow that entire platform is bad for said games", when there are clearly other options out there and other factors not being taken into account (like this site will ever want to discuss them). Small platform?. |
Chazore said:
And yet there are 5 options that have already been chosen and are already being used. |
Guess you wanted to understand the way you wanted instead of the way it is. What I said is that, neither you or kerotan choose to use the tally and say that any of the platforms were health enough to play but engaged in a bickering about which platform if better. And regarding the previous quote. Still have no idea how buying X game on a platform that have it on very little numbers is a good option because y,w and z sell good on it. I want a good community for the X game not the others when I buy it.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."









