Nintendo needs to first think about how to get their fanbase to use their platforms as a third party platform of choice rather than making the third party unique first. Thats fine for first party, but allow your third party following to amass itself first. Its complete stupidity for them to keep forgetting that.

Translation: no ports of PS4/Xbone games. Just little whatever titles for the Wii, I mean Switch.

Capcom has tremendous titles for 3ds tho, but yea no one should expect a clone of capcom main titles (RE and SF) for NS

Well, I did say potentially, and I would still welcome some ports over. There's the other side of the coin where it just doesn't work out, and the NS is in the same situation as the Wii U.

Well the support was unprecedented, anyway this pretty much means that RE7 seems to be a no go for Switch.

They always do, and third parties always conclude they aren't worth the effort and skip them.
Nintendo has to realise that raising barriers to 3rd parties in order to be special gains them nothing.

Same.

 Its not really the third parties fault. Nintendo cannot be the third parties first priority when they have over sixty million gamers (and growing) to attend to elsewhere. Thats just on consoles as well. Nintendos unique games should come after they amass a third party following on their platforms once more. They should be happy they get ports, but they want to have their cake and eat it too. Im behind them with their demands for unique third party, but Nintendo should let their fans of more diverse gaming (Nintendo and third party games that is) grow and become accustomed to proper third party support. People forget that Nintendo hasnt had proper third party support since the mid 90's and then it became dismal in the 2000's. Nintendo got their unique games with the Wii but because third parties did not have the time to focus on them they did not take the ventures seriously and went for cash grab games. If Nintendo could get western developers to take them seriouslly then this will work out very well for all parties, because as it standds now if third parties gave in, the only person who wins is Nintendo would get to boast that t hey have third party , without them gaining any sort of return.

The thing is though, Capcom's comment isn't really referring to different versions of already available games, but games that are different altogether, and it sounds like they can port games over as well if they like. And this is just Capcom. How other 3rd party companies will approach the Switch, well, who knows how that will go.

it doesnt bother most people anyone who says otherwise is looking for an excuse for these games failing on Ninty systems. There is NO excuse, they burned their 3rd party bridge years ago with N64 and was never able t truly recover. If anyone truly thinks Ninty could fix a 20 year problem in a few months is crazy.