Pyro as Bill said:
1. Simpler experience for consumer. Plug in cart and play. Try a friend's game overnight without the hassle of making space on the HD.
2. No online subscription. No barriers to online play. Consumer has more cash for games.
3. Free advertising/demos in the form of other gamers playing their game on the bus, train or at school.
4. Share a system that has Pokemon, mobile CoD multi, mobile FIFA/Madden multi, mobile GTA multi (possibly).
5. Simple and powerful LAN gaming solution. No dedicated servers to support or online connection required.
6. System's mobility allows more gaming uptime. More games needed to meet demand. $$$.
7. Potential to rival iPad for some people, especially youngsters. Simple TV-out, 4K content, Youtube, Netflix, Whatsapp, Skype, accessories/addons.
8. First party support at levels never seen before combined with the best track record of delivering new, breakout IPs.
9. Custom joy cons and other accessories for niche software. Pedometers, GPS(?) for new types of gameplay.
10. Safe, known quantity when treated as a Nintendo handheld compared with VR and Microsoft's track record.
11. All the 'Nintendo fans' in one place instead of split over two consoles.
12. No requirement to be at the cutting edge. Cheaper to develop, port opportunities.
|
1. I don't think this matters almost at all and if it does, one might even argue that it hurts sales because you can just borrow games from your friends instead of buying them.
2. Valid point, assuming it's true.
3. Valid point, but this probably has only a minor effect for most games.
4. This isn't a benefit for third parties! If anything, this is bad for them because there's going to be more competition.
5. I'm possibly ignorant but I don't know what you're talking about so I can't really comment on this.
6. Valid point, although I suspect the effect isn't very big.
7. Switch isn't probably going to have many services on it. If it does, this is a valid point, but personally I wouldn't hold my breath. Also, it's probably harmful for third parties anyway since there's going to be more competition for the users' time.
8. Again, more competition so not good.
9. Valid point but like you said: for niche software.
10. I'm not sure what you mean with this point so I'm not commenting on it.
11. Valid point.
12. Double-edge sword for obvious reasons.
Conclusion: There's some good points, some passable points, and some that are probably more harmful than beneficial (for third parties). That said, you didn't really say they'd all be good for third parties, so there's that...