Again, you've become jaded. Nor do you reflect the majority. You may be tired of the Wii Remote control scheme, but given the brisk pace of hardware and software sales, I'd say you're rather the opposite of the majority.

So to use your analogy, Porsche and Jaguar should just close down because they don't cater to the masses?

No. They have a market, and for the market they have, they need to cater to them.

The Wii is so successful because it caters to so many different types of people. The PS3 and 360 cater to a smaller audience, but for what the PS3 and 360 do well, the Wii is not the right tool.

The Wii is great, I love mine, but I also love my PS3 and my 360.

 That's still looking at it from an elitist gamer perspective though.

 While the Wiimote has been primarily used and succesful so far with the casual games (specifically one casual game that happens to come with the system), it offers innovation all accross the range of games. This can be seen in the innovative, completely new way of playing games offered in Metroid Prime 3, Resident Evil 4: Wii Edition, No More Heroes and Zack and Wiki. No other system offers the type of experiences those games provide.

I may agree with you on the depth of play issue--the PS3's use of Blu-Ray discs means games can be much larger than anything on the other consoles (though that has yet to be used in practice--we'll see with MGS4 and it's probably 800 million okay to awesomely awesome cut scenes), but graphics, while something a certain percentage of gamers crave, is not innovation and has never been something that makes a system more attractive to people overall or conversely holds a system back. It's very easy to up graphics cards and create more lifelike (or, truth be told, more cinematic) graphics, but
such things do not a great game make (see Kill Zone, or Kane and Lynch, or hell, to stay somewhat on topic, the diminishing returns of every Madden game since 2005).

What people, specially hard core gamers, seem to forget is that the most graphically superior console is rarely either the best selling or best console. PS2 was the weakest graphically of the 4 6th gen consoles, yet in addition to the obvious sales advantage had by far the best game library. All XBox was able to get with it's amazing graphics was Halo, and as great as it was, one franchise can't make up for the overall better system PS2 was. Of the 5th gen sstem, the best graphics were on Saturn. Hell, fifth gen best graphics was probably either Neo Geo or Jaguar. Who the hell wants those systems?

Anyway, to try to get back on topic somewhat, an EA system would probably just be a half assed Xbox-type system. As stupidly as they're run, I doubt they'd be stupid enough to make a console. no one buys a system for EA games--people buy EA games that interest them for the system they have. Even the casual argument doesn't work, because EA has been busy making all of their casual games harder and harder for casual fans to get into (could nayone who hasn't played Madden for years be able to figure out how to play it well? I doubt it). Even buying Take Two probably wouldn't help, because once Rock Star's developers start being forced to work under EA slave labor conditions, they'll jump ship, and GTA and Bioshock will start to suck. Which is why I hope EA fails hard in it's takeover bid of Rock Star.

Sky Render, that's his opinion, and it doesn't necessarily mean he's jaded or anything. You could argue that the Wii sells because it's a novelty, and that many Wii owners will feel the same way after using the controller for a while.

I disagree, I like the Wii's software lineup complemented with my PC games, and I like to have something much different than my PC games when playing on a console, so the Wii works perfectly. But I can see how a non-PC gamer might only prefer the HD consoles with standard controls.

^
Lol...every time someone doesn't like a nintendo product, he or she has become jaded? I don't think so...

Wii mote works for activities...such as throwing, hitting, poking and aiming...etc...but its not a secret that games like Smash brothers and Mario Galaxy as a whole would be better controlled with a normal gamecube controller. Hence why most new games give you multiple ways of controling the game. For example, Sega Superstar tennis is unplayable with the wii mote...luckily there is 3 ways to play the game.

But if you are playing with a Wii a normal controller...why not get the xbox 360 or ps3 version which has better graphics and sound?

Before the inevitable "Wii software isn't selling well lol" line, let's do a week comparison: week 70 of the Wii (the most recent), and week 70 of the 360 (equivalent week). The 360 has the edge in this comparison, since it had a full year of no current-gen competition, and thus had plenty of time to drum up consumer support with nobody save the PS2 getting in the way.

30 March 2007 (360, week 70)
Hardware: 83,452 units sold
Software: 400,599 copies sold
Ratio: about 1:4.8

21st March 2008 (Wii, week 70)
Hardware: 403,568 units sold
Software: 2,456,332 copies sold
Ratio: about 1:6

Whoops, there goes the theory that Wii software isn't selling.

 Seeing that you know so much about the future of gaming, can I borrow your crystal ball? 

Wow, you really don't get it, disolitude... I've spelled it out for you at least 3 different times, but you still haven't seen it, I guess. You are not the majority. You do not represent the majority. The majority speaks with its money. The majority is favoring the Wii. There is nothing here that defies logic or indeed should be able to provoke any sort of argument. Every last word of it can be backed up with results, if that's your kind of thing. That you are tired of the Wii Remote is moot in the big picture.

Nowhere does he say Sony or MS should shut down. But by going elite (or in MS's case, always being that way), they've lost thier ability to cater to the mainstream. PS2 was the Camry of the 6th gen. Sony forgot this and they're stuck with being the Porshe. Whch is a nice thing to be, but as Sky Render said, a whole lot fewer people want a Porshe than a Camry.