By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - If Trump loses, do you think he will try to run again in 2020?

 

Do you think Trump will run again for president if he loses this election?

Yes 28 9.40%
 
No 128 42.95%
 
I hope he does 31 10.40%
 
I hope he doesn't 86 28.86%
 
I don't care 25 8.39%
 
Total:298
pokoko on 25 October 2016
Ronster316 said:
Bandorr said:

You dropped your tin foil hat. You are basically suggesting ignoring all regular news in favor of infowars, Breitbart, and the drudge report.

You are basically the homeless man on the corner complaining that the radio waves are infecting your brains while the aliens take over the world.

I mean you just literally combined a bunch of conspiracies that have already been disproven in one long rant.

Disproven? HAHAHAHAHA, only because the Clinton News Network, and all the other biased mianstream media sites continue to cover unproven stories about trumps "so called" rape accusers, and then go on to give NO AIR TIME to Wikileaks or the Project Veritas story currently doing the rounds

Its people like you who are the problem, you will SWALLOW anything the Mainstream media feed you.

 

Same BS happened with Brexit, BBCs remain BIAS was simply way too obvious, and she same crap is happening again now with the presidential elections.

And you will swallow anything fringe news websites feed you as long as it lines up with your pre-existing opinions.  You are what you are complaining about.  You are untrustworthy and biased beyond what a rational human being can excuse.  Why doesn't your own hipocrisy bother you?  Why is it okay for you to depend on biased websites and sources?  Why aren't you calling yourself out?

This is why no one will ever take you seriously.  Ever.  You complain about CNN?  Alright, a lot of people are on board with that (and FOX, too, of course).  But then you cite a video that any logical adult would question because of all the edits and cuts, in addition to the dubious history of the producer?  You throw your own credibility out the window.

Nevermind that petty terms like "Killary" and "Clinton News Network" sound really freaking childish.

Go examine your own bias.  Go examine your own sources.  Go examine your own verbage.  Then maybe you'll see why most people aren't going to trust what you say, either.



Around the Network
Ronster316 on 25 October 2016
pokoko said:
Ronster316 said:

Disproven? HAHAHAHAHA, only because the Clinton News Network, and all the other biased mianstream media sites continue to cover unproven stories about trumps "so called" rape accusers, and then go on to give NO AIR TIME to Wikileaks or the Project Veritas story currently doing the rounds

Its people like you who are the problem, you will SWALLOW anything the Mainstream media feed you.

 

Same BS happened with Brexit, BBCs remain BIAS was simply way too obvious, and she same crap is happening again now with the presidential elections.

And you will swallow anything fringe news websites feed you as long as it lines up with your pre-existing opinions.  You are what you are complaining about.  You are untrustworthy and biased beyond what a rational human being can excuse.  Why doesn't your own hipocrisy bother you?  Why is it okay for you to depend on biased websites and sources?  Why aren't you calling yourself out?

This is why no one will ever take you seriously.  Ever.  You complain about CNN?  Alright, a lot of people are on board with that (and FOX, too, of course).  But then you cite a video that any logical adult would question because of all the edits and cuts, in addition to the dubious history of the producer?  You throw your own credibility out the window.

Nevermind that petty terms like "Killary" and "Clinton News Network" sound really freaking childish.

Go examine your own bias.  Go examine your own sources.  Go examine your own verbage.  Then maybe you'll see why most people aren't going to trust what you say, either.

Clinton news network coverage of Trumps assault "accusers" average was 70 minutes over a 3 hour period recently...... coverage of the wikileaks documents on CNN over a 3 hour period......  2 MINUTES.....I'll just leave this example here to "Educate" you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irqLMTg-f_U



pokoko on 25 October 2016
Ronster316 said:
pokoko said:

And you will swallow anything fringe news websites feed you as long as it lines up with your pre-existing opinions.  You are what you are complaining about.  You are untrustworthy and biased beyond what a rational human being can excuse.  Why doesn't your own hipocrisy bother you?  Why is it okay for you to depend on biased websites and sources?  Why aren't you calling yourself out?

This is why no one will ever take you seriously.  Ever.  You complain about CNN?  Alright, a lot of people are on board with that (and FOX, too, of course).  But then you cite a video that any logical adult would question because of all the edits and cuts, in addition to the dubious history of the producer?  You throw your own credibility out the window.

Nevermind that petty terms like "Killary" and "Clinton News Network" sound really freaking childish.

Go examine your own bias.  Go examine your own sources.  Go examine your own verbage.  Then maybe you'll see why most people aren't going to trust what you say, either.

Clinton news network coverage of Trumps assault "accusers" average was 70 minutes over a 3 hour period recently...... coverage of the wikileaks documents on CNN over a 3 hour period......  2 MINUTES.....I'll just leave this example here to "Educate" you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irqLMTg-f_U

I don't watch CNN so I really don't care.  I don't watch any of the cable news channels.  Your response has nothing to do with what I said, which is quite interesting.



OneTime on 25 October 2016
Ronster316 said:

Clinton news network coverage of Trumps assault "accusers" average was 70 minutes over a 3 hour period recently...... coverage of the wikileaks documents on CNN over a 3 hour period......  2 MINUTES.....I'll just leave this example here to "Educate" you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irqLMTg-f_U


I saw both articles, and gave them equal weighting.  Clinton I know to be a politician of many years, she will have a lot of dirty laundry for people who go digging.  Trump seems to have a similar quantity of dodgy dealings in his business life.

I can give both Hillary and Trump the benefit of the doubt that they had to do things that they were uncomfortable with at the time.



Final-Fan on 25 October 2016

There's no way he'll run in 2020 after losing in 2016. His actual strong points are as a showman and marketer. He won't back out of a fight he's losing, but there's no way he'll walk into a repeat of it.



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Around the Network
Ganoncrotch on 25 October 2016

The worst thing when reading this thread though, is that people presume he will lose, and when people do that they don't bother to go out and vote because they think that the outcome is already decided... can lead to a major upset.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Cirio on 25 October 2016

I mean, does he really have much to lose anyways if he does?



Ronster316 on 26 October 2016

Screw it, Trump has this in the bag, disagree? how about this?  my permaban vs all you Hilary shills avatars endorsing trump for a month..... who dares take the bet?



Final-Fan on 26 October 2016
Ronster316 said:

Screw it, Trump has this in the bag, disagree? how about this?  my permaban vs all you Hilary shills avatars endorsing trump for a month..... who dares take the bet?

Suicide isn't the answer!  You'll always have Ted Cruz. 



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Alby_da_Wolf on 26 October 2016
AbbathTheGrim said:

Do you think he will go for payback on 2020, claiming "I lost because it was all rigged" during the four years of Clinton?

Do you think he could have a chance of winning on 2020 even if he loses this election? What would it take for Trump to win on a 2020 hypothetical run?

Would you want him to run again?

People going apeshit against them are the only amusing thing in this horribly boring Donald Woodpecker vs. Hillary Imhotep campaign, so they should both try again, but next time stay silent and let fans and haters do everything.   

Any of them winning will make people miss not only Obama, Clinton or Reagan, but even Dubya.



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW!