By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ronster316 on 25 October 2016
Edit Thread
pokoko said:
Ronster316 said:

Disproven? HAHAHAHAHA, only because the Clinton News Network, and all the other biased mianstream media sites continue to cover unproven stories about trumps "so called" rape accusers, and then go on to give NO AIR TIME to Wikileaks or the Project Veritas story currently doing the rounds

Its people like you who are the problem, you will SWALLOW anything the Mainstream media feed you.

 

Same BS happened with Brexit, BBCs remain BIAS was simply way too obvious, and she same crap is happening again now with the presidential elections.

And you will swallow anything fringe news websites feed you as long as it lines up with your pre-existing opinions.  You are what you are complaining about.  You are untrustworthy and biased beyond what a rational human being can excuse.  Why doesn't your own hipocrisy bother you?  Why is it okay for you to depend on biased websites and sources?  Why aren't you calling yourself out?

This is why no one will ever take you seriously.  Ever.  You complain about CNN?  Alright, a lot of people are on board with that (and FOX, too, of course).  But then you cite a video that any logical adult would question because of all the edits and cuts, in addition to the dubious history of the producer?  You throw your own credibility out the window.

Nevermind that petty terms like "Killary" and "Clinton News Network" sound really freaking childish.

Go examine your own bias.  Go examine your own sources.  Go examine your own verbage.  Then maybe you'll see why most people aren't going to trust what you say, either.

Clinton news network coverage of Trumps assault "accusers" average was 70 minutes over a 3 hour period recently...... coverage of the wikileaks documents on CNN over a 3 hour period......  2 MINUTES.....I'll just leave this example here to "Educate" you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irqLMTg-f_U