^^^Thanks for the info Shika.
https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png
^^^Thanks for the info Shika.
https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png
| Soundwave said: Hold that loss AMD theorists. Hold it nice and long. |
I'll take it. It was a decent bet on AMD but I guess I was wrong.
| Slade6alpha said: Is Nvidia any good? What's the other option, AMD, Intel? Hope they have a dedicated conference for this thing, they must obviously if the thing is releasing in march. |
nvidia is better than amd
Four ARM Cortex-A57 cores, max 2GHz
NVidia second-generation Maxwell architecture
256 CUDA cores, max 1 GHz, 1024 FLOPS/cycle
4GB RAM (25.6 GB/s, VRAM shared)
32 GB storage (Max transfer 400 MB/s)
USB 2.0 & 3.0
1280 x 720 6.2" IPS LCD
1080p at 60 fps or 4k at 30 fps max video output
Capcitance method, 10-point multi-touch
Supposed dev kit specs.
Ljink96 said:
Well it's a custom chip, a brand new chip in fact. It might be almost as powerful as a Xbox One which is amazing for a handheld. |
But kinda shitty for a hybrid console that's supposed to replace the Wii U.
Do you honestly think a solid version of RDR2 is possible on the Switch, for example?
shikamaru317 said:
Nvidia usually tops AMD performance at any given flops level. So for instance if Switch is 900 gflops in console mode, it could in theory match the 1300 gflops AMD chip in Xbox One. Though I doubt Switch has more than 700 gflops in console mode, maybe only 500 if it's using Tegra X1 instead of X2. The tradeoff is that AMD is desperate for deals while Nvidia usually isn't, so Nintendo might have paid alot for these Nvidia chips, and knowing Nintendo they'd pass that cost on to the consumer instead of eating it themselves, meaning a high release price possibly. |
That's not how performance metrics work. Performance is absolute. A 1 TFLOP GPU is always more powerful than a 800 GFLOPS one. But absolute metrics are just one thing, both AMD and NVIDIA have some differences in GPU design which can be benificial depending on use case scenerio.
For example, Nvidia's Pascal is a really efficiënt architecture and quite powerful, but AMD's Polaris seems to be better optimized for newer API's and is quite efficiënt to boot.
| xl-klaudkil said: Four ARM Cortex-A57 cores, max 2GHz NVidia second-generation Maxwell architecture 256 CUDA cores, max 1 GHz, 1024 FLOPS/cycle 4GB RAM (25.6 GB/s, VRAM shared) 32 GB storage (Max transfer 400 MB/s) USB 2.0 & 3.0 1280 x 720 6.2" IPS LCD 1080p at 60 fps or 4k at 30 fps max video output Capcitance method, 10-point multi-touch Supposed dev kit specs. |
it´s Pascal lmao Nvidia said it in the blog.
| shikamaru317 said: Wonder what that final AMD semi-custom gaming chip is for then? New Sony handheld? Sega comicg back into the console market? Xbox VR headset with it's own chipset? |
Wasn't Amazon rumored to making a console?
|
onionberry said: SUPERMETALDAVE 64 ON SUICIDE WATCH |
You can be so mean when your right. I am actually hyped for the Switch. Day one purchase for me. This system makes my Vita look like my grandmother's portable.

Hey! They got SONY on my amiibo! Wait a minute. Two great gaming tastes that game great together!
Switch FC: SW-0398-8858-1969
"The high-efficiency scalable processor includes an NVIDIA GPU based on the same architecture as the world’s top-performing GeForce gaming graphics cards."- https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2016/10/20/nintendo-switch/
This implies Pascal.
“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).
"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)