By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - BattleField 1 is one of the worse performing tittles at 60fps on Consoles, runs at 620p in some cases! Awfull!

sergiodaly on 18 October 2016

everyone is freaking out and calling EA to the stand and while that happened i did see the video, while the framerate does fluctuate quite a lot, theres no noticeable tear in the frames and the game just tries to run the best it can in the hardware in question. If we were talking about bugs and poor mechanics, that is a bad practice to launch games in that form, but this is a weak argument for one to consider as a deal breaker. i played the ps4 beta same as most of us in here and despite the muddier quality of the textures the game run in a very satisfactory matter, so claiming now that it is not worth of purchase is not very logic. the beta run at 900p on ps4 and 720p on xbox, like the games before it from DICE with this engine, so if it does go below that sometimes i have to think that is occurs very rarely.

Proudest Platinums - BF: Bad Company, Killzone 2 , Battlefield 3 and GTA4

Around the Network
walsufnir on 18 October 2016

 

Radek said:

Wait what? 620p to 1014p on PS4 as well? This doesn't make sense, we all know PS4 has more powerful hardware, it shouldn't have been lower than 800p or at least 720p on PS4. Also there is some bug that makes game drop resolution to 160x90 JUST WTF. Looks like they spent all the time optimizing for Xbox One after all... BF4 and Battlefront had quite stable 60 fps and 900p on PS4. Also PS4 performance is actually worse? How? Samey resolution on both and PS4 CPU is only 150 MHz slower and GPU is more powerful. That right there is called shit optimization for PS4.

Relax, it's only a video game. Your console is still the best of the best.



theprof00 on 18 October 2016

To be completely fair, there is a LOT of smoke effects in that game. I don't think I've seen so much dynamic smoke on the screen without something sacrificing for it, like resolution or frame rate.



Pemalite on 18 October 2016
Radek said:
walsufnir said:

 

Relax, it's only a video game. Your console is still the best of the best.

This has nothing to do with which console I think is better. If one console is more powerful than the other and this has been proven multiple times in the last 3 years it shouldn't perform worse in the same resolution. BF4, BF Hardline, Battlefront, Mirror's Edge Catalyst all 900p and better frame rate than Xbox version @  720p. I just hate unoptimized ports.

You state that this has nothing to do with which console is better... Then go on a tangent describing how your console is better. Stay classy vgchartz. :P

But yes. Horrible ports need to be shamed regardless of platform, but considering how relatively bug-free Battlefield 1 is, I think we should think ourselves lucky this time around... Could have been Battlefield 4 levels of bad.

theprof00 said:
To be completely fair, there is a LOT of smoke effects in that game. I don't think I've seen so much dynamic smoke on the screen without something sacrificing for it, like resolution or frame rate.

Alpha Effects* It tends to smash the hardware hardcore.




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite

Azzanation on 18 October 2016

Disgusting resolution.

Dont buy this game, no matter how good the gameplay, story or sound is. If those pixals fall below the standard this game is worthless and a waste of time. - Modern Gamer.



Around the Network
GribbleGrunger on 18 October 2016

Is this a bug like on the PS4 or is it legitimately what should be happening?



 

The PS5 Exists. 


barneystinson69 on 18 October 2016
Radek said:
Pemalite said:

You state that this has nothing to do with which console is better... Then go on a tangent describing how your console is better. Stay classy vgchartz. :P

But yes. Horrible ports need to be shamed regardless of platform, but considering how relatively bug-free Battlefield 1 is, I think we should think ourselves lucky this time around... Could have been Battlefield 4 levels of bad.

Alpha Effects* It tends to smash the hardware hardcore.

*Sigh* You just assumed that better specs = better console by default and I didn't say that.

Also I need to be pointing these things out because few days ago there was a guy here saying games run at the same resolution on Xbox One now a days and told me to prove him wrong... And just to prove that he was wrong I had to post 10 games this year that run on lower resolution on Xbox One, which I wouldn't do if he just agreed that it's the case. People spread a lot of disinformation that's all.

I just wanted  my point out that more powerful hardware should run Battlefield 1 in higher resolution like any other game. It's pretty obvious 620p shouldn't happen if the usual gap between the two is 720p/900p and 900p/1080p. If Battlefield 1 drops to around 620p on XB1 then it  shouldn't drop below about 800p on PS4. Not to mention PS4 actually performs worse and has this atrocious bug with 160x90 resolution which makes xbox fanboys go crazy on YouTube and forums. That's all I wanted to say.

How Sony allowed this game to release in such state is beyond me, Good Job DICE.

Yes, good job indeed: http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/battlefield-1



Made a bet with LipeJJ and HylianYoshi that the XB1 will reach 30 million before Wii U reaches 15 million. Loser has to get avatar picked by winner for 6 months (or if I lose, either 6 months avatar control for both Lipe and Hylian, or my patrick avatar comes back forever).

FIT_Gamer on 18 October 2016

So I've played through 2 of the 5 storylines so far. It's fucking amazing. 



chakkra on 18 October 2016

OK, honest question here:   Do you guys really notice this?  I mean like,  you're in the heat of battle, and of all of a sudden the resolution drops from 1080p to 900p.  Do you stop and say "wait a minute, the resolution dropped down just right there"?

 

I mean, have you ever (without Digital Foundry or any other site telling you) have you ever been able to notice the dynamic resolution in any game?

 

I'm really curious here.



ironmanDX on 18 October 2016
chakkra said:

OK, honest question here:   Do you guys really notice this?  I mean like,  you're in the heat of battle, and of all of a sudden the resolution drops from 1080p to 900p.  Do you stop and say "wait a minute, the resolution dropped down just right there"?

 

I mean, have you ever (without Digital Foundry or any other site telling you) have you ever been able to notice the dynamic resolution in any game?

 

I'm really curious here.

If they're going to be honest with themselves... Of course not. Digital foundry takes time to pixel count on still screens. Do you think they'll notice a 1080 to 900  change during gameplay?

 

Ever since that 90p news has come out, some of the prior responses in this thread are hilarious.