Jumpin said:
Poor Lyra 😠I thought the women’s rumble match was a little crowded for too long. The problem when that happens is too many get lost in the mix and it feels like the match is at a standstill for too long. We got to see a lot of interaction, but almost no story to speak of. Just a lot of stuff going on in small parts of the ring, but nothing much exciting. The Royal Rumble March is great for two reasons: 1. It’s a battle Royale - and 2. It’s a gauntlet. I kinda feel like the gauntlet part of it was a bit muted - and that’s the part where standout wrestlers are built.
The men’s rumble, when Priest, Knight, Sami, Drew, Roman, Punk, and Seth all went out in like a 3 minute window, I was wondering WTF happened? Well, for those going for Sami, his brother won! 😠Anyway, on WWE shows. I mostly prioritize NXT - and it’s the only show I regularly watch top to bottom when time’s afforded. It’s a different type of show than RAW or Smackdown. Much less hierarchical, and so it feels more like everyone’s story is important. Anyone who isn’t featured regularly are a treat when they’re on the show. But RAW and Smackdown are more focused on a few characters. Those who aren’t in the focus window are extras/jobbers, and their matches/stories feel like filler with no tension. For me, those are easier to skip. It feels like on NXT that whenever a big story happens, that it wasn’t forced, that it rose organically. IMO, Gargano and Ciampa’s story was the best in the last 10 years of WWE, one that rose to the top with a cult-like following. It happened in NXT, without needing those 20 minute promo windows. In other words, RAW and Smackdown are more a pyramid. With some exceptions, your storyline is really only important when you’re near the top. Otherwise you’re either unimportant or have found some niche as an entertaining sideshow flair (like R Truth, Logan Paul, or LA Knight) - I feel like Penta, right now, is the exception to the rule where he’s both a big sideshow but somehow also comes off as significant. NXT is more like a Mastaba where everyone is on the same level, and it’s just a matter of proximity to the altar or the throne. On top of that, mostly everyone has the chance to get their sideshow flair (or gimmicks) over. So, I find the shows are mostly fun beginning to end. Look at DIY, in NXT these guys rose to the top because they have a lot of talent. But on RAW/Smackdown they’re stuck in unimportance. Their stories have no tension, no real stakes besides unimportant titles, whether they win or lose matches is inconsequential. That’s how I see WWE. Don’t get me wrong, I like all the shows, and understand that RAW and Smackdown are where the biggest stars are. But most of the RAW and Smackdown roster would be more fun to watch on an NXT-like show. Another thing, NXT never gets stale. When someone gets too big, they never have the chance to lose their lustre while monopolizing the top, as they’ll be transferred to RAW/Smackdown before that happens. Sometimes they get to the top of the pyramid, but it’s a small peak; so, more often than not, they become a shell of their former selves (DIY is a probably the best example). |