Honestly at the moment the only game worth hearing about is EVE Valkyrie, and it's multiplat, nothing else really seem to push me to get a VR.

Open platforming have helped PC so much that only when consoles made themselves closer to PC and simplified porting they got more AAA games, but for some reason all these immense number of VR PCs that already bought the headset are setting the world on fire right?

I just love how you have been demisive of everyone in here so far.

Yep, PC have had AAA games, but curiously it was tough dead for so many years with ludicrous sales right?

:P

"Reprojection" isn't a magic bullet. The reason for it's entire existence is because the Playstation's hardware is extremely limited, which is the same reason checkerboard exists.

It's a similar premise to the "motion" technology that many TV's have, where "fake" frames are inserted between two frames to simulate a higher framerate... And let's be honest, in person it's always looked a little "off".

PC VR is the place to be, you can have all the graphics effects dialed up to 11, you can downsample, you have the best anti-aliasing possible and you are not restricted to any framerates...
PSVR is no where near being in the same ballpark. It's good, but it's not the best.

The PC is also likely to have the most VR-supported games, thanks to modders and patches costing devs nothing.

I highly doubt VR will ever go mainstream on console or PC... It all comes down to costs, it's a hard pill for anyone to swallow dropping hundreds of bucks on an accessory.

Just because you are unaware of what games are on the PC, doesn't mean that it is lacking AAA experiences.

Every platform has exclusives... And you know what? The PC usually has the best multiplats as they typically have better graphics, framerates and at a lower price.

The PC as a platform is still growing, it's got more gamers than the PS4 and Xbox One and Wii U combined right now.

On how flops are calcuted?

Take the PS4's 1152 shaders... 2 instructions... 800mhz Clockrate... For 1.84 Teraflops.
But it also ignores the rest of the graphics processor and system so it's not an accurate representation of a devices total performance.

Yup, he turns eveything into a PC thread. I dont even bother anymore. 

I'll say the same thing I said to Zero recently. Keep it in on topic, or at least try to understand why someone thinks a certain way before dismissing their posts. This type of comment could have been left at a PM.

This goes for everyone, not just Intrinsic.

As far as I understand it, it's a lot more simple than "motion flow" and the like. psvr is simply shifting the image a bit based on the latest headtracking information. Everything still moves at 60fps, yet headtracking positioning is corrected at 120hz to help combat motion sickness. I don't know whether they render a slightly bigger frame or smudge out the edges, need to see it in person.
No clue if it will look a little "off", I never use motion flow, 24p mode for me :) Yet when you turn your head you want the screen to stay stable, so 120hz is best I would imagine. PSVR can do native 90hz too btw.

PC VR is restricted to 90hz (for now), perhaps ps4 pro can do native 120hz in some games. But sure, you can add as much rendering grunt as you want on PC and downsample from 5210x2160, although tough to render that at locked 90fps.

The place where they are really not in the same ballpark is store presence and price. I checked for Canada, an OR setup from scratch will cost you CAD 2500 and up. (And that's not one you'll be supersampling with nor use ultra settings) While the most expensive psvr combo will cost you CAD 1200 or get started at CAD 1000 for ps4 base + headset + camera. (No HTC Vive announced yet here, Amazon.ca offers it for CAD 1700)
(If you already have a capable PC or ps4, it's CAD 850 vs CAD 550/700)

I don't expect either to sell a lot at those prices.

PC will have the most supported games, yet there's a difference between patched or modded VR capabilities and designed for VR. DriveClub is touted as the best VR racing experience yet, a lot of effort went into retooling the game for VR. Sony seems interested for now to nudge developers into designing specific VR experiences, but there's always the risk they'll lose interest again like with 3D and Move. (Although VR is bringing those back)

http://www.theverge.com/2016/9/16/12939356/driveclub-vr-preview-tgs-2016
And while competing VR racing games on PC do have an edge in terms of absolute resolution and detail, PS VR's RGB-stripe display means Driveclub VR has an overall cleaner appearance than racing games I've played on the Vive and Rift.
It's a trade off. There is no ultimate VR experience yet, way too early.

I've been a PC gamer since 1998, I know perfectly well what games are on PC.

Not trying to be a dick here, but I will quote myself once again to see if you get my point:

"the PC is lacking the real AAA experiences that the PS4 will get, and that's the advantage of having a major 1st party supporting the platform."

 I'm speaking mostly about 1st party games that Sony will push to support the VR platform. There aren't many AAA VR games for now in general, but the ones that will be coming out are for now PSVR exclusive.

So, yeah... I love my PC and can't even fathom playing certain types of games on a console, but we've got to be realistic here. VR success is linked to PSVR, not PCVR right now.

You can see into the definite written in stone future?. That's a pretty bold assumption to make. What about mobile VR and how huge that market is?.

But it's also not true. Because the PC will get all the console exclusives anyway. It's a matter of when, not if.

VR is not going to go mainstream untill it hits a low enough entry price, it's not low enough even with the PS4VR.

There is potential for sales to go gang-busters in the future though which is what these company's are betting on.

I am aware that there is more to reprojection than that, but I was also trying to keep it simple, this forum isn't exactly filled with the most tech-savvy enthusiasts I have ever seen.
It's also still not as good as a native solution either.

I am *really* interested in how the scene will evolve in the PC space, because modders from all corners are lifting their heads and taking notice.