First response win. This always happens before an 'oifficial' price is named. They have to put something into their system, and so you end up with oddly high pricing in many cases. $450 is sort of odd though. You normally see more round numbers, 400, 500, 600 etc.

I have no doubt Nintendo could sell a powerful general purpose tablet ( slash handheld+homeconsole+4k streaming box) for $399. Thats not their style though.

$250-$299 is my expectation.

Doubt it unless it can teleport hookers into my room

I wouldn't mind it because it would mean better hardware most likely, but I doubt it.

Lol, so they want to sell less than the Wii U eh? We need a photoshop job of the most recent pic leak of the console with a $450 price tag

PS VR..... allows porn....

Loll better than nothing.

I think the 350pound $400-$450 price tag is absolutely legit. If it was a $999 placeholder, they wouldn't have bothered to take it down.

What I am puzzled about is the negative reaction of many on here. Almost everyone wants a powerful system, but then people bash them for a price that implies a powerful system?

And if it's not powerful but yet is the next big casual innovation craze, like Wii, it won't matter what it's priced; Wii's could have sold for $400-$500 back in 2006.

The only issue is if the system sucks, in which case it doesn't matter the price.

450? Shit better have PS6 specs.

Changed the title, it wasn't listed for $450, regardless of how the currency converts.