DonFerrari said:
WolfpackN64 said:
It's not about keeping power to yourself, it's about using power that is in the hands of many for the benifit of many against corporate greed.
|
Yessss, we had several ton of examples in Brazil of how that don't work. And in the world we also had several examples of similar enthursting to a powerfull entity to get the better for everyone, never really working out.
Just on the union example that you brought... we have over 15.000 union in brazil and under 100 in UK right? Which place have better wages and working environment? And just on a quick look I saw that union membership halved since the 80's in UK and that it keep decreasing and one of the reasons is that workers see that one of the priorities of the union leads is to benefit themselves and get special threatment.
But we are going way off-topic.
|
But I like to hold it here. The UK's union membership has been beaten over and over again by the former Thatcher administration and 2 rightist Labour governments didn't help. The social movement is gaining steam again in the UK.
Brazil is an entirely different story. Unions might have nodded in approval at Rousseff's social-democartic'ish policies, but an economic crisis due to overreliance on export and a political coup by a wealthy elite in lightning quick succession might have taken them by surprise. But don't be surprised that, if Temer stays in power, the unions become more militant.
In Belgium, we need the unions. We have a government that continuously tries to ram austerity down our throats while handing ever greater tax cuts to companies. Thanks to the unions, we managed to slow down their policies. Alone, we could not have tried to halt this policy direction.
And if it was not for unions historically, we'd all be working 50 hour weeks at least.