By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Even More New Pokemon Announced!

ClassicGamingWizzz said:
tbone51 said:

Previous gen! Gen 6 i mean. Greninja is pretty badass though... 

Gen 6 is one of the best lol want me to name like 20 pokemons that are better than anything this gen?

Xerneas have probably one of the best designs ever in a pokemon is a example.

Noivern Hawlucha Aegislash ...

Anything in gen 6 is better than any of the new gen pokemons.

 

But why do you ask btw? Just gave my opinion.

Wanted to see what your taste were like. Gen 7 pokemon so far have out of the park (well all over the place) some fugly ones and weird ones (bewear and mimikyu for example) but i think some like vikavolt and minior are pretty good.

 

Whats your opiniom on the alola forms?



Around the Network
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
tbone51 said:

Wanted to see what your taste were like. Gen 7 pokemon so far have out of the park (well all over the place) some fugly ones and weird ones (bewear and mimikyu for example) but i think some like vikavolt and minior are pretty good.

 

Whats your opiniom on the alola forms?

I like ninetales , others are for pokemons that i never liked or cared, sandslash is decent.

Why do people like ninetails! Jk. I love sandslash amd marowak is cool but original better there.

 

I think there is huge potential fpr rowlet final evo especially if it looks like that leak. Maybe the next greninja. Maybe you'll like it. 

 



RolStoppable said:

Indeed, and that's how our last conversation played out. You insisted that you must hate Pokémon Go because it's damaging Pokémon's good name, I told you that the sales of the Pokémon games you love have increased in all countries where Pokémon Go released, therefore PoGo is not damaging the Pokémon IP, but rather doing the exact opposite. Your response to that was the equivalent of "nahnahnahnahnah", hence why I can call you stubborn in good consciousness.

 

Good name, meaning the name Pokemon can be associated with quality games. Success =/= quality. That isn't "nahnahnah," it's the facts. Your stubbornness here comes from denial.



RolStoppable said:

What makes you believe that the name Pokémon isn't associated with quality games to the same extent anymore?

Or rather, what makes you believe that people can't tell the difference between a mainline game and something like Pokémon Go? Someone who thinks that Pokémon Go sucks isn't going to take that to mean that the mainline games suck.

 

Doesn't really matter what it's currently associated with, releasing crappy games certainly isn't going to raise the quality standard, only lower it. Why is it bad to want quality and not like/criticise crap? Just because it's successful? I personally don't like when things are successful for the wrong reasons.

Yeah I'd like to believe that too, but Pokemon Go is a lot of people's first and only experience with Pokemon, and first impressions mean a lot. 



RolStoppable said:

It doesn't matter? Your entire argument is built on that:

Here you call it factual. I asked you where your belief comes from, but your answer is pretty clear in that there were and are no facts that you based your opinion on.

But at least this now gives you a serious shot at showing whether you are stubborn or not.

 

Obviously the games, where else? I thought you might be trying to spin the discussion away so I was keeping us on track. I do stand by that they have a good name, but their current state is irrelevant towards whether or not Go is hurting it, which is or atleast was the initial discussion. If you want to discuss whether Pokemon has a good quality standing then sure we can do that too I guess since it wont take long.

Everyone is stubborn, so it's means nothing whether I am or not, which I am btw, just as you are. Pretty sure I explained this already.