| RolStoppable said:
What makes you believe that the name Pokémon isn't associated with quality games to the same extent anymore? Or rather, what makes you believe that people can't tell the difference between a mainline game and something like Pokémon Go? Someone who thinks that Pokémon Go sucks isn't going to take that to mean that the mainline games suck. |
Doesn't really matter what it's currently associated with, releasing crappy games certainly isn't going to raise the quality standard, only lower it. Why is it bad to want quality and not like/criticise crap? Just because it's successful? I personally don't like when things are successful for the wrong reasons.
Yeah I'd like to believe that too, but Pokemon Go is a lot of people's first and only experience with Pokemon, and first impressions mean a lot.
