ljigga said:
|
Who will win Super Bowl LI? | |||
| New England Patriots | 51 | 47.66% | |
| Kansas City Chiefs | 3 | 2.80% | |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | 6 | 5.61% | |
| Other (AFC) | 3 | 2.80% | |
| Dallas Cowboys | 10 | 9.35% | |
| Atlanta Falcons | 15 | 14.02% | |
| Seattle Seahawks | 5 | 4.67% | |
| Green Bay Packers | 5 | 4.67% | |
| Other (NFC) | 4 | 3.74% | |
| Scoreboard | 5 | 4.67% | |
| Total: | 107 | ||
ljigga said:
|
lol I actually may lose in fantasy to Arkaign's brother who never even logs in thanks to the Steelers feeding Antonio Brown TDs. Nice
| Angelus said: lol I actually may lose in fantasy to Arkaign's brother who never even logs in thanks to the Steelers feeding Antonio Brown TDs. Nice |
Hahah, well don't feel bad, I have scored the most points in the entire league, yet STILL have 5 losses for 3rd place. Every couple of weeks someone just has a monster week against me. I had bad luck too given expectations. CAR/NO was supposed to be a shootout, with NO defense giving up lots of points to QB. Didn't work out that way. I had Dak on the bench, and it turned out that if I had started him, I would have won :P Bah.


| Miguel_Zorro said: Thanks to the strength of the west, it looks like the AFC wildcard requirement could be as high as 11 wins this year. |
Probably not 11, although 10 is certainly reasonable. The AFC West is going to spend the last 6 games of the season carving itself up. KC plays Oakland, Atlanta, and Denver twice before season's end. Denver has New England, Oakland, and those two games against KC. Oakland has the easiest schedule out of the three left, with the toughest games being the divisional ones mentioned earlier, but both of those are on the road.

| MIN-DET | 1 | WAS-DAL | 2 | PIT-IND | 1 | TEN-CHI | 1 |
| JAX-BUF | 2 | CIN-BAL | 2 | ARI-ATL | 2 | NYG-CLE | 1 |
| LA-NO | 2 | SF-MIA | 2 | SD-HOU | 2 | SEA-TB | 1 |
| NE-NYJ | 1 | CAR-OAK | 2 | KC-DEN | 2 | GB-PHI | 2 by 7 |
|
J-E-T-S JETS!!!!!!
Also I refuse to pick the Chargers despite coming off a bye and playing against a weak Hosuton team because they are BUTT.
Survivor Millennial vs Gen X!!
| MIN-DET | 2 | WAS-DAL | 2 | PIT-IND | 1 | TEN-CHI | 1 |
| JAX-BUF | 2 | CIN-BAL | 2 | ARI-ATL | 2 | NYG-CLE | 1 |
| LA-NO | 2 | SF-MIA | 2 | SD-HOU | 2 | SEA-TB | 1 |
| NE-NYJ | 1 | CAR-OAK | 2 | KC-DEN | 2 | GB-PHI |
NobleTeam360 said:
|
Changing SD v HOU to Houston winning.
burninmylight said:
|
| MIN-DET | 2 |
WAS-DAL | 2 |
PIT-IND | 2 |
TEN-CHI | 1 |
| JAX-BUF | 2 |
CIN-BAL | 2 |
ARI-ATL | 2 |
NYG-CLE | 1 |
| LA-NO | 2 |
SF-MIA | 2 |
SD-HOU | 2 |
SEA-TB | 1 |
| NE-NYJ | 1 |
CAR-OAK | 2 |
KC-DEN | 2 |
GB-PHI | 2 by 3 |
RolStoppable said:
How come that your team is suddenly projected to win with ease against mine? Not that I trust projections, but still... that's a bummer heading into the rest of week 12. Kudos for offering a defensible trade for Beasley this time. Why did you even drop him in the first place? |
Adams production is slightly better than Beasley (1 more TD, slightly more yards). I don't put much value in secondary receivers, thought you might like to complete your set of Packers lol.