Arkaign said: More food for thought, and this should dismiss outright the idea that the Vikings are going anywhere : Jay Cutler, coming off of injury and with basically zero practice time, recorded a rating of 100.5, taking only 1 sack, averaging over 8 YPA, and connecting on about 64% of his passes. The Viking's only 'strength' certainly didn't do the job there. How about defending the run? Nope, they allowed 153 yards to Howard, at a stunning 5.9 per attempt. They couldn't stop it even when selling out to stop it. Against CHICAGO'S O-line. Minnesota's lead back barely cracked 40 yards in return, while Bradford was sacked 5 times, and recorded a 20.9 QBR. And Minnesota was even lucky that it wasn't worse. The Bears fumbled zero times. The Vikings fumbled twice, and the ball bounced right for them not to lose either. |
The way I see it, that could very well be just a mulligan more than anything. Interdivisional games are very much a crapshoot, and you'll almost always find a really good team play absolutely pathetically against a divisional rival at least once a year. New England played like shit in Miami last year in a game that cost them homefield advantage. Pittsburgh blew a game against the 5 win Ravens last year that almost cost them a trip to the playoffs (and, incidentially, they only made it because the 10 win Jets played miserably against the already eliminated Bills in a game that could've clinched a playoff spot for NY). Denver lost to San Diego a few weeks back. Seattle is legally required to get fucked by the Rams at least once per year.
I could go on, but the point is don't put too much stock in a divisional loss, even if it's to an awful team like the Bears. The Pats got shut out by the Bills at home this year (admittedly with a third string QB, but still played well below the level they had in any of the game prior). Divisional games have a habit of being extremely unpredictable due to the familiarity between the two teams.
Just for fun, I'll make my own Vikings predictions though:
Lions: Coin flip (Agree here)
at Redskins: Coin flip (Washington is entirely unpredictable)
Cardinals: Win (Cards are 2-2-1 in last five games, with wins against 49ers and Jets. I wouldn't say they're heating up just yet.)
AT Lions: Loss...probably (this is the Lions)
Cowboys: Loss
at Jaguars: Win
Colts: Win (Dude, the Colts suck. Especially their D. They've only held 2 opponents this season below 25 points)
at Packers: Loss
Bears: Win. It's at home, and it's a revenge game.
Let's say they go 1-1 in coin flip games. That's 5 wins. 10-6 will definitely be good enough for at least a wild card. Realistically, 9-7 will probably be good enough for a wild card too. Redskins, Giants, and Eagles (the wild card competition at this point) all still have to play each other, and still have to play Dallas one more time. The Redskins and Eagles also still both have to play Green Bay, while the Giants have to go to Pittsburgh. The NFC East is going to be a bloodbath over the last quarter or so of the season. I don't think there's any way two of those teams finish the season with less than 7 losses.
Incidentially, I'm not claiming that you said that Atlanta's defense was better (or as good as) Minnesota's defense. What I'm saying is that Minnesota has a stellar defense that makes the two cases less comparable. Minnesota's issue is the weaker side of their team (offense) is in a slump, so they at least have their defense to rely on. Atlanta's offense hit the breaks, however, meaning they had no strong unit to rely upon. The Vikings' excellent D (best in the league by points allowed) can keep them in games and probably let them steal at least one or two that they might not deserve.