I made it very clear that I wanted to see at least ONE game (emphasis on ONE) to at least rival the likes of what the competition has to offer (such as uncharted 4, overwatch, fallout 4).

Did I say it had to been a technological masterpiece? No. I listed wii sports for crying out loud. Did he have new technology to work with? Yes he did, the gamepad (he himself influenced this). As a wii u owner, I trusted him to work on at least one phenomenal game to rival the competition (sakurai did well, we will see how aunoma performs).

He made many games AND IP to not only rival the competition, but to set precedents and lead the way to future gaming. That was his "touch". Therefore, to see his recent output dwarfed by games like dark souls 3, doom, or the witcher 3 makes me think that he can't keep up (i.e. that he lost his "touch")

I already explained before what "Creative Fellow" meant.   President Kimishima stated that his role as Creative Fellow is to nuture the new and young talent within the company (mentor basically) and spread the Nintendo IP into new fields...he's heading up the Universal Studios theme park collaboration for instance.

Being uber influential does not mean he makes all decisions for all game designs and direction. 

And did I not just list the actual developers of several recent games including Star Fox Zero as being developed by a 3rd party (Platinum Studios)? 

Accountability is the company as a whole.  Nintendo is not just Shigeru Miyamoto.  Especially given that his role in the comapny is more business than development now.   Why not blame the director?  Why not blame the designer?  Why not blame the artists?  Why not blame the actual people resonsible for creating and directing the game?

And given that his role is what it is, he doesn't have the time to lead a major production which is why what he has worked on lately ahve been small projects.  he himself even stated that he only wants to work on small projects. 

http://www.wired.com/2011/12/miyamoto-interview/

I am under the impression that he was tasked by Iwata to have games that showed the gamepad's potential. He was also the one to head starfox's development.

you love to blame platinum, but when starfox was shown at e3 2015, we already had miyamoto playing with the dual screen gameplay already built, and Nintendo in the looks to outsource the work to a third party studio. How could platinum have made that decision if a third party company hadn't been picked?

You still never answered my question. What has he done to merit keeping his "touch"