spemanig said:
I mean technically more visually impressive. As in, how good does everything look from a techical point of view that cannot be made up by something more subjective like art style? That's why I don't think it's important to take those luxuries into account at all. They chose to make the game more open, and they knew the game would look worse for it. They chose to make the game run at 30fps instead of 60fps, and they new their game would look better for it. They were in charge of their luxuries, and they were prepared for the benefits and downfalls of budgeting them. But I don't want to keep going though, as I think I've dragged this far enough. |
Fair enough. Do you mind if i PM you? I'm really rather confused. It feels like you're disagreeing with my original comment, but your reasons as to why make it feel like we're having two different conversations.









