Hate on me if you want but I almost prefer the top one. It feels a little daker, richer.. I like that over the almost cartoony illuminated lighting of the 2016. I'm obsessed with the series so I'm a day one buyer regardless!
Hate on me if you want but I almost prefer the top one. It feels a little daker, richer.. I like that over the almost cartoony illuminated lighting of the 2016. I'm obsessed with the series so I'm a day one buyer regardless!
I dont see how people can prefer the 2015 model, just look at thé skin shaders on his face compared to 2016, it's just better as à fact.
Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:
PS4: 17m XB1: 10m WiiU: 10m Vita: 10m
| Aerys said: I dont see how people can prefer the 2015 model, just look at thé skin shaders on his face compared to 2016, it's just better as à fact. |
Considering the amount of discrepancies this thread has made, I don't think saying 2016 is better as a fact is actually a fact. 
Interestingly, I prefer the 2015 one. Something about the newer one looks odd, like the characters look a bit like clay. Lighting feels kind of odd as well. I will commend that the apples look better in the newer one.



![]()
Dance my pretties!
The Official Art Thread - The Official Manga Thread - The Official Starbound Thread
Wright said:
Considering the amount of discrepancies this thread has made, I don't think saying 2016 is better as a fact is actually a fact. |
Well it surprises me, among thousands of people, only here i saw so much discrepancies about this comparison, weird.
So you can look at me in thé eyes and say that Nathan face looks better in 2015 ? Just yes or no, no other answer allowed 
Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:
PS4: 17m XB1: 10m WiiU: 10m Vita: 10m
| Aerys said: Well it surprises me, among thousands of people, only here i saw so much discrepancies about this comparison, weird. So you can look at me in thé eyes and say that Nathan face looks better in 2015 ? Just yes or no, no other answer allowed |
It looks different, that's the answer I can give you. Given that you've only presented me two random pics with different lightning, things can work all ways. While the light reflection on Nathan works better in 2016, he seems to have more detail in 2015, albeit he looks weird.
Because, honestly, can you look at me in the eyes and say that Nathan arm didn't suffer a massive downgrade in 2016? Just yes or no, no other answer allowed. :)
So youre telling me only à différent( and not improved as you insist on it) lightning justifiés such big différence on thé face render? That seems far fetched.
And i can say no since it's obviously blurr preventing to see thé arm in détails , we know that since you can see it in many other scènes )
Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:
PS4: 17m XB1: 10m WiiU: 10m Vita: 10m
| Aerys said: So youre telling me only à différent( and not improved as you insist on it) lightning justifiés such big différence on thé face ? That seems far fetched. |
You're the one adamant on saying people "look at the insane upgrade" using these two photos, but when presented with the dilemma of a problem in the 2016 photo you just go and say "it's blur, you guys can't judge that" thing? But it's far fetched to say that the 2015 photo has more detail but the lightning changes things around?
Why not bring two comparable images that didn't have the problem in the first place?
Why are you basing the insane upgrade in a photo that actually prevents from seeing details? Why not those "many other scenes"?
You see the problem with the scenario, right?