Which one | |||
| Overwatch | 79 | 33.47% | |
| Doom | 124 | 52.54% | |
| Neither | 33 | 13.98% | |
| Total: | 236 | ||
| Nautilus said: Neither for now.Not getting Overwatch because since it does not have a single-player, it should have been free(to some extent at least), and its not my favorite genre too.Not getting Doom 4 because it has not caught my eye yet.If it gets great reviews I might change my mind though. |
@bolded, why?
@OP I'm probably gonna pick up Doom 4 sometime down the line.
Teeqoz said:
@bolded, why?
@OP I'm probably gonna pick up Doom 4 sometime down the line. |
I think becasue its MP only, happy it's not though because it could easily be pay 2 win, I don't wanna pay for characters XD
Natsu said:
So I'm guessing you never got titanfall? |
I did buy Titanfall, that's one of the big factors as to why I avoid buying MP only games now.
NobleTeam360 said:
I did buy Titanfall, that's one of the big factors as to why I avoid buying MP only games now. |
That's kinda funny cause Titanfall is one of the big factors I'm okay with buying MP only games (not full price though)
| Wildcard36qs said: This is not the Doom I grew up with. Watch some videos, it's like call of Doom and not a good arena shooter at all. |
It's more quake than cod... Hell, feels more like Halo than cod.
I'm getting it day one. Played the closed beta, felt pretty good. Did you play the beta?
Edit: Seen a few doom 4 posts, isn't it a reboot not a continuation?
Teeqoz said:
@bolded, why?
@OP I'm probably gonna pick up Doom 4 sometime down the line. |
As I stated before, its mostly because there is no single -player for the game.You may think its kind of silly, but for me its important.I would never buy a game thats multiplayer only, unless its a revolutionary game.And Multiplayer only games, unless its MMo or something of the like(because then it has a story to tell, progressions, things found in single-player), should offer a free version, even if it was extremely limited
My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.
https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1
Natsu said:
That's kinda funny cause Titanfall is one of the big factors I'm okay with buying MP only games (not full price though) |
I should clarify what I mean, I'm not saying I'll never buy a MP only game, just not at launch/full price.
Nautilus said:
As I stated before, its mostly because there is no single -player for the game.You may think its kind of silly, but for me its important.I would never buy a game thats multiplayer only, unless its a revolutionary game.And Multiplayer only games, unless its MMo or something of the like(because then it has a story to tell, progressions, things found in single-player), should offer a free version, even if it was extremely limited |
So basically what you are saying is all multiplayer only games should have a free version? (Except MMOs for some reason)
I'm generally not a fan of multiplayer only games (Rocket League is the exception, it has me completely hooked. And before you ask, yes, I paid for it, didn't get it with PS+), however I think that's completely ridiculous. It's like what you are saying is that multiplayer games don't offer anything worth paying for.
NobleTeam360 said:
I should clarify what I mean, I'm not saying I'll never buy a MP only game, just not at launch/full price. |
Ohh, yeah agree witht that. I got titanfall for 8 bucks XD
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
Currently Online 
