Okay, you've officially stepped outside of the box I like to refer to as "reality"

This is a game console. You are playing GAMES. The founding fathers included nothing in our civil liberties about a right to use save files to unlock content in games.

1 st MS gives you a exclusive gamertag with a profile that you play your games under as you beat games you get achievements! the top guys on the leader boards have over 250,000 gamerscore! if you play a game like enchanted arms and theres a european, american and japanese version!

If you beat the game once all you have to do is get the other 2 versions and pop in the disk and your 1st save file unlocks those versions g-score a quick 2000 gamerscore in 1 minute!

I feel if your willing to buy the game 3 times to get that what ever its a flaw in the system but it does over inflate Gscore to show 3000 gscore for the same game!

I have a friend he's put up 42,000 in a year and a half and he's really not intrested in a game if he cant get gscore!

I guess MS doesnt want GScore to be so meaningless as to let it overinflate it by cheating! because like the cheater who needs instance gratification the guy who plays by the rules feels its meaningless and goes to another system!

It's just funny.

I don't see how people can get that upset about it.

Microsfot need a 'whinging bitch' gamer card for the people that complain.

 No.  It's not like that at all.  It's a video game rewards system.  It's not that big of a deal.

game developers set what an acheivement is not MS hince some are super hard for 10g's and others are easy any 2k6 sports games instant 1000 in a game or 2 ! I got 90 g's off burnout legends and trade it in I dont feel slighted or gipped because I couldnt get a 1000 off it!

 I hope the annoying list is next. the blogging point was simple, what I do offline shouldn't be policed and told to the world, it's giving the online community the idea that I cheat online, and I should be watched out for, and thats not true, I don't and can't cheat online. I honestly admit anything I do, but the idea that the company that i've given so much money over the years is going to publish me on  some list for some type of embarssement is silly. It's basically saying since you've been such a good customer, we're going to publicly humiliate you. It's also silly because wiping out my gamerscore eliminates any reason for keeping that account, I could just open a new one. Secondly I can assure you people who didn't cheat will be published on that list.

And maybe I would get over it, if someone would just see my point of view instead of treating my like a jerk. Seriously I deserve all that they give me and more? I spent 60 bucks on the game 60 bucks a year for online, 400 bucks on the system, a 100 bucks on the wireless device, and since a skipped a level I deserve public humiliation and more? Do you think Microsoft should ban me? For paying money to them and playing honestly online and offline(just occasionaly with someone elses save). 

The bottom line is this: This can only hurt Microsoft. It will piss off people who are on the list, and even those of you who love the idea I don't believe will runout and buy more stuff with Microsoft on it as a reward for their policing effort. 

I pity the foo'!

(that's my Mr. T impression. Pretty uncanny, wouldn't you say?)

 You apperantly aren't reading my posts, I don't even like the achievments and will be gald when they are wiped out. My point is a company should not embarrase it's customers with a list that exposes them as a cheater, when 1. they can't cheat online. and 2. offline cheating  has nothing to do with the rest of the world. I'm fine if they came up with a way of stopping me from taking credit from other saves, in fact when i used someone elses save I didn't even know that would work and was shocked it did. 

 I just think the list is misleading, it'll make other gamers think you've been caught cheating online. and that you shouldn't be trust in matches.

^i was using an open "you" and you cant play "honestly" on and off line using someone else's save

Agree to disagree?