By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - HD-DVD dead - now for the real Challenge Blu-Ray vs DVD

The problem with HD movies and TV is that it is unnoticeable from upscaled standard definition. The whole thing is completely stupid. I don't care what format you're talking about. Complete scam.



Around the Network

Blu-ray will do really well, but i doubt it will ever sell as much as the DVD did. Most people right now are satisfied with DVDs and won't buy Blu-ray until it becomes so cheap that everyone will be able to buy it.



 

twesterm said:

 


I think my TV is big enough (past a certain point it just becomes a little excessive and expensive, for me at least) and I can't tell a difference. Then again, my TV also can't do 1080p, I don't have 7.1 sound, and I just can't tell enough of a difference between a BluRay movie and my upscaled movies on my PS3 to justify the price difference.



Perfectly understandable since my TV can only go up to 1080i and is 40" (or maybe 42", I forget).

 

 

The size of the screen can be a prety big factor even with standard def.  I remember watching my Jurassic Park DVD at my friend's house on their 30" and I was like, "Man, this is a really good looking DVD!"  A few weeks later, we watched it at my house on our 52" and I was like, "Wow, this looks like crap compared to what I watched a few weeks ago."  The key is the resolution stored on the disc.  A DVD looks really good, especially upscaled on a smaller set, but the image looks bloated if you try to get it too big. 

You can actually project a Blu-Ray onto a 100" screen or more without noticing any significant dip in quality.  TV technology will get better too, which will make the difference even more extreme.

 



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

Many movies are shot at 1080P and 2K these are common resolutions for digital cinema cameras - (it may goto 4K eventually but it's still a way off) . 1080p scales well to a 20Meter cinema screen.

Regards Upscalling it's a joke if you cant tell the difference move closer to the TV or buy a new TV capable of 1080P ( sales people will sell you 720p resolution and tell you it's 1080p capable BIG difference ).
HD will start to look like SD when you are 4 meters back from a 40inch display. But movies are meant to be watched with a wide view angle you should be sitting back no further than 3* the diagonal size of the screen - The ideal distance is around 1 to 2* the diagonal screen size - pretty much how you would see it in the cinema sitting between 10-50 meters back from a 20meter screen.

Ie 2 meters back for a 42Inch display is good - you get the full immesive effect and see all the detail as you would sitting in the cinema.



PS3 number 1 fan

Here's a relevant article from today:

 Report: Blu-ray Disc Sales Impacting DVD



PSN ID: free
Gamertag: X freestyle X