| SvennoJ said: I highly doubt it. Even if it's going to happen they will be cheap and slow read only cards, which have to install to the hdd before you can play. Making convenient 300 MB/s uhs sdhc cards on which you can also write save games, way too expensive. I wonder if Sony is going to use 4K discs next gen. Games keep getting bigger, and one 100 GB disc is probably cheaper in the long run than 2 standard blu-rays. Adding an extra layer is all a 4K disc is anyway. Most games won't need 3 layers, a lot only need 1 actually. |
TLC NAND can hit roughly 20cents per gigabyte right now, I wouldn't be surprised if it could be done cheaper via stacked, it's still not going to be cheaper than mass produced optical discs though.
But... Load times of 300MB/s with 1-2ns access times is VASTLY superior to the PS4's 27MB/s and 180ms access times of it's blu-ray drive. (That's 180,000,000 ns)
It would allow for streaming to be very feasible.
300MB/s transfer rates is also 2-3x faster than a mechanical Hard Drive, which is something you won't get out of cheap TLC NAND+controller set-up.
Though... On the bright side you probably wouldn't need a hard drive if you were using 300Mb/s Flash as the storage medium, provided each "cart" had a few gigabytes of extra storage for extra content or something.
Also Discs aren't tied to a resolution.
You could do 4k movies on a regular 700 Megabyte (Aka. PS1) compact disk, unfortuntately... You would likely have to compromise on bitrate and run time substantually... And no commercial hardware players would be able to read it natively, you would need a "Smart" device to do so that can already output at that resolution.
In short you don't need a 100Gb disc to do 4k, it's just marketing buzzwords that you have grasped onto. A 25/50Gb Blu-ray disk using h.265 for 4k video would be sufficient for most people.

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite












