By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - The Legend of Zelda: TP HD Review Thread (MC: 85)

Pavolink said:
Goodnightmoon said:

Because TPHD is way worse than WWHD and most reviews point that. Logic.

And the 3ds games were remakes not remasters, remakes usually get better scores for obvious reasons.

Again, according to you? Because reviewers disagree. As I mentioned above the scores says otherwise (NGC version is 96 like TWW). So no, you are wrong and again trying to defend Nintendo. If this game scored lower is because it is a dissapointing remaster.

He's saying that TP remaster is worse than WW remaster. I think we can all agree in that :P. 



Around the Network
Volterra_90 said:
Pavolink said:

Again, according to you? Because reviewers disagree. As I mentioned above the scores says otherwise (NGC version is 96 like TWW). So no, you are wrong and again trying to defend Nintendo. If this game scored lower is because it is a dissapointing remaster.

He's saying that TP remaster is worse than WW remaster. I think we can all agree in that :P. 

Yep, I agree, then.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Pavolink said:
Goodnightmoon said:

Because TPHD is way worse than WWHD and most reviews point that. Logic.

And the 3ds games were remakes not remasters, remakes usually get better scores for obvious reasons.

Again, according to you? Because reviewrs disagree. As I mentioned above the scores says otherwise (NGC version is 96 like TWW). So no, you are wrong and again trying to defend Nintendo. If this game scored lower is because it is a dissapointing remaster.

The scores TP got in 2006 with all the hype and all the "look is so realistic" shit of the time made it scored like WW, a game that was underrated for some critics for having a kiddie look. 

But we are not in 2006 anymore, times gives perspective and the vast majority of critics today agree that WW was way better, I have been reading this in most TPHD previews, and I completely agree.

But if you want to believe that the game is 5 points lower now just because the WW ilumination system looked more cool, then you are free, but it sounds kind of dumb to me.



spurgeonryan said:
It always amazes me that a game that had better reviews back on the GC and Wii, could go down in points years later even though it is an updated and better version.. Plus! Win win for us, not more motion control.

Rewievers are significantly harsher nowadays. And remasters, even if they're the definitive version, could feel outdated today, so... That's maybe the reason why TLOU remaster wasn't so penalized, as it was a remaster of a game which came 1 year earlier. Maybe. I don't understand reviewers a lot xDDDD.



Pavolink said:
Goodnightmoon said:

Best 3D Zelda game remastered 10 years later: 90

Worse 3d Zelda game remastered 10 years later: 85

It seems pretty logic to me.

Best and worst accoding to you? Don't go into the subjective route because everyone has a different opinion. For example, TWW is the worst and weakest 3D Zelda ever, yet it manage to get a score in the same vein as OoT3D and MM3D. Why TPHD didn't?

Err... I'm not a huge Zelda fan, but I have some friends that are, and they all agree that Wind Waker is one of the most beautiful games they ever played.



Around the Network
Alex_The_Hedgehog said:
Pavolink said:

Best and worst accoding to you? Don't go into the subjective route because everyone has a different opinion. For example, TWW is the worst and weakest 3D Zelda ever, yet it manage to get a score in the same vein as OoT3D and MM3D. Why TPHD didn't?

Err... I'm not a huge Zelda fan, but I have some friends that are, and they all agree that Wind Waker is one of the most beautiful games they ever played.

Beautiful, yes. Gameplay wise? No. If they believe so tell them they are wrong.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Pavolink said:
Alex_The_Hedgehog said:

Err... I'm not a huge Zelda fan, but I have some friends that are, and they all agree that Wind Waker is one of the most beautiful games they ever played.

Beautiful, yes. Gameplay wise? No. If they believe so tell them they are wrong.

Except they arent, specially gameplay wise, WW has the best combat system of the franchise.



Pavolink said:
Goodnightmoon said:

Because TPHD is way worse than WWHD and most reviews point that. Logic.

And the 3ds games were remakes not remasters, remakes usually get better scores for obvious reasons.

Again, according to you? Because reviewers disagree. As I mentioned above the scores says otherwise (NGC version is 96 like TWW). So no, you are wrong and again trying to defend Nintendo. If this game scored lower is because it is a dissapointing remaster.

Disappointing but still scoring 85, an excellent score.



Goodnightmoon said:
Pavolink said:

Beautiful, yes. Gameplay wise? No. If they believe so tell them they are wrong.

Except they arent, specially gameplay wise, WW has tbe best combat system of the franchise.

It is fast, yes. But being so easy ruins it. Although, TP has the same problem (and its slower combat made it boring).



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Goodnightmoon said:
Pavolink said:

Beautiful, yes. Gameplay wise? No. If they believe so tell them they are wrong.

Except they arent, specially gameplay wise, WW has tbe best combat system of the franchise.

Well, yeah, I agree with this. The only problem with WW was the filler "find the triforce's pieces" quest. Jesus. It could be nearly perfect. But I still think it's a better game than TP.