By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - 2D Mario vs 3D Mario?

 

?

2D Mario 32 30.77%
 
3D Mario 72 69.23%
 
Total:104
V-r0cK on 02 March 2016

 

V-r0cK said:
2D all the way. Nintendo has the 2D platform formula locked down that no other 2D platformers compare to 2D Mario games for me. (LBP, Rayman are good but just doesn't quite cut it for me)

While I personally think DK actually has 2D Mario beat these past 2 gens, I think the Mario's primary advantage over the likes of LBP and Rayman is in its controls/physics. Nintendo has that tight, responsive handling down to a fine science, while others still seem to struggle with it.

Agreed. Nintendo has this magical formula that just can't be beat.



Around the Network
thatguymarco on 02 March 2016
curl-6 said:

 

thatguymarco said:
3D>2D>3Dish

What's 3D-ish?

3D Land/World.



I'm now filled with determination.

Pavolink on 02 March 2016
curl-6 said:
thatguymarco said:
3D>2D>3Dish

What's 3D-ish?

3DWorld. Not a real 3D Adventure Mario game.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


curl-6 on 02 March 2016
thatguymarco said:
curl-6 said:

 

What's 3D-ish?

3D Land/World.

In that case, I agree.

I enjoyed 3D World, but it's not up to the level of Galaxy 1/2, 64, Bros 3, or World.



thatguymarco on 02 March 2016
curl-6 said:
thatguymarco said:

3D Land/World.

In that case, I agree.

I enjoyed 3D World, but it's not up to the level of Galaxy 1/2, 64, Bros 3, or World.

The games just don't really seem like they did anything that special, they just brought 2D Mario to 3D, I think those games would've been much better if they were treated like a proper sequel to the classic 2D games, but in 3D, instead of just making Mario 3 again. 



I'm now filled with determination.