Zkuq said:
Because the investigators will come up with excuses to do this in other cases too. Once it's done, it's easier to do it next time. And once it's done, it'll be much, much harder to fight it next time. To be honest, I don't care what Apple's motive behind this is, I just agree with what they're doing here. I generally dislike Apple but not here. This is a huge matter and shouldn't be decided in a court, I don't think. I don't mind warrants for electronics, but forcing the manufacturers to help in this manner... I'd say that's questionable at best. |
Then it's up to Apple and the Judge to look at the facts, and decide whether the lesser crime is worthy of this level of access. This was Apple's choice. They made their hardware this difficult to deal with, and so they will have to fight every request, as they come, that's their new reality. According to the current ruling, Apple must do this. Now, what the penalty is to Apple specifically for refusing, I've no idea (If the Government wanted to be dicks, they could file charges against Apple for obstruction of justice/aiding a foreign terrorist organization). However, what the penalty could end up being at the Government level, across all tech companies is infinitely worse, than what you're theorizing here. Think about it.
Personally, I think these individuals lost their right to privacy when they decided to do what they did. So, while I definitely think privacy is worthy of protection and fighting for, I believe these individuals gave up those rights and protections.









