If the problem lies on the camera, then simply remove the ability to look at the characters from all sides and angles. It's not that hard.

But you're okay with that.

You know, that was a redicules issue. Shows how peoples looks towards sexual content changes. Because in GTA 5. You can have the ladies do lap dances and ride all over the characters crotches. And Trevor is fucking a woman, at the start of his story. And all the Hot coffee mod did, was enabled clothed sex poistions. Tamer than anything GTA 5 has done. Did anyone get those cutscenes removed, no. That was just 10 years later.

A better censorship free example is Saints Row. Even the Aus version wasn't really censored. They just disallowed the dumb dildo gun to be sold there. I just gifted the gun to my friend. And the game gave two shits.

Yes it sucks! But we need to also consider WHAT IS BEING REMOVED. 

If people are not buying this game because of the things that have been removed (Petting, Clothing options, Dual Audio) then obviously they are looking for the wrong game with wrong reasons.

I can accept people not buying the game beacuse of its "Price". Even though 1 version will probably have a better story and characters available than Awakening. 

THANKYOU! It feels like the people Not Buying the game because of the stuff that has been removed, Have never played Awakening or past FE games. They should know how awesome Awakening was even without those SEXUAL FANSERVICE. Oh Well, they are missing out on a great game! 

Nintendo should just make a DLC for this content. Or Even Better! An Amiibo which unlocks all these content!!! = $$$$$$$$ 

I just don't get the anger about this stuff. Nintendo do so many things that are legitimately wrong, but people get upset because they localise their game (noting that localisation includes adhering to cultural norms of a region).

I don't care.

Is it censorship if it was already locked out though? It was stuff that was never meant to be accessible in the final release. Pretty much the same as those hidden temples on wind waker that were unlocked via the action replay.

This example is content being removed that was available in the original full release of the game in another territory.

However, that "double censorship" was never available legitimately in any release of the game. Whereas in this instance it was, that in itself is the difference.

Failed concepts/ideas aren't censorship, that is just creative process, Rockstar North chose not to go in that direction. The fact that the ESRB then decided AO was needed because of locked off content being unlocked wasn't "double censorship". It wasn't meant to be accessible in the final product in the first place.

In this instance, the full game was released in Japan, then the Western branch decided that might not go down as well, and so the finished product has been "censored" for a specific audience.

If Hot Coffee was in the Japanese release of GTA but not the others, that would also be censorship. As it stands, it's actually artistic choice of the developer. It's only censorship when it's been removed, having supposed to have been there in the first place.

XDDDDD. That would be obviously ridiculous, but seeing how people really care about bikinis, why not take advantage of this? Take your bikinis, for fuck sake. If their absence is supposed to make the game cheaper like 5/10 bucks (how somebody can think this is beyond my imagination...).

I see some people jump off the wagon when GTA was in the ecuation. How predictable.