By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Each version of Fire Emblem Fates does not have as much content as Awakening.

outlawauron on 17 February 2016
Jranation said:

Also want to note the blocks it takes:

FE:A - 8,579 blocks 

FE: Fates - 24,666 blocks

 

BUT!!!!!!!!!! According to Serenes Forest, Fates only use 12,239 blocks. The remaining ones could be related to the other Versions. 

Soooo this is another way to see which one has more "Content" without actually playing the game. 

I really hope you don't actually believe that file size is an argument for value. There are far better topics to argue for.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Around the Network
Jranation on 17 February 2016
outlawauron said:
Jranation said:

Also want to note the blocks it takes:

FE:A - 8,579 blocks 

FE: Fates - 24,666 blocks

 

BUT!!!!!!!!!! According to Serenes Forest, Fates only use 12,239 blocks. The remaining ones could be related to the other Versions. 

Soooo this is another way to see which one has more "Content" without actually playing the game. 

I really hope you don't actually believe that file size is an argument for value. There are far better topics to argue for.

Im just throwing things out there. VGChartz users does love numbers! 



Pocky Lover Boy! 

Wyrdness on 17 February 2016

Fates has online

http://gematsu.com/2015/06/fire-emblem-fates-online-multiplayer



Jranation on 17 February 2016
Wyrdness said:
Fates has online

http://gematsu.com/2015/06/fire-emblem-fates-online-multiplayer

Didn't Awakening also have online? 



Pocky Lover Boy! 

IkePoR on 17 February 2016
Clyde32 said:

Besides we all know Radiant Dawn is still going to be the best one. 

Hooray for bottlenecks and playing exactly the way the game demands you play!



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"

Around the Network
Wyrdness on 17 February 2016
Jranation said:
Wyrdness said:
Fates has online

http://gematsu.com/2015/06/fire-emblem-fates-online-multiplayer

Didn't Awakening also have online? 

It had 2 player local co-op but not online play.



Jranation on 17 February 2016
Wyrdness said:
Jranation said:

Didn't Awakening also have online? 

It had 2 player local co-op but not online play.

 

Oh! And thats more "content" or "playing hours" you you! XD 



Pocky Lover Boy! 

lasershow on 18 February 2016
Faelco said:
spemanig said:
The logic used here is extremely flawed. Scenario is not being accounted for at all. It doesn't matter if you're experiencing the same map or characters when the scenarios, challenges, and objectives on the map are completely different between versions.

If you're told to kill king poo in birthright in 12 turns or whatever, but in Conquest you have to escort princess pissplease across the map in 5 turns without her getting attacked by an enemy, but in Revalation you have to stall the other side for 8 turns, and the story reason behind all three is completely different, but it all takes place on the same map, they all hold the same value.

 

We can talk about the scenario if you want! It's easy, you need the 3 versions if you want the full story with all infos and the true ending. So story-wise, it's not 3 games but one. And one pretty bad story from what I've read... 

 

But yes, it would be great if this new thing was not supported by the gamers. The overpriced DLCs of Awakening have been accepted, the Amiibo DLCs are accepted, now the games cut in three for more money are accepted... Well, some people can accept anything when it's from Nintendo, and Nintendo knows that. They know thanks to that how to make money without a good-selling console and with less games, good for them. 

 honestly, I got Awakening for $39.99. I played 140 plus hours. Way more than my moneys worth on that game. If I buy all three games (two downloaded at half price/lower price points), even if I ONLY get 140 hours out of it, it would still ne great value for my money, that's why I'll suppourt it.



Illusion on 19 February 2016

                               

When Awakening came out, everybody was mad that Nintendo had abandoned the old-school Fire Emblem gameplay.  Now Nintendo gifts us with a Fire Emblem release that allows us to experience Fire Emblem the old way that fans have been asking for (Conquest) while still being able to earn money with the much more mainstream friendly Birthright.  It's very likely that Conquest is going to be a loss for Nintendo (like most of the old-school Fire Emblem games were) and it's clearly being done for us fans so I think that it is completely reasonable that there is some repeated content and a $20.00 upgrade cost.

If you don't like the pricing for Fire Emblem Fates then you should buy one of the games, forget the other two exist and just be happy with your typical 40 hour Fire Emblem experience.