I agree with that. That's a nice quality of theirs to be honest. Nintendo fans are very used to dealing with people criticizing nintendo in immature or mature ways, the few who can't deal with it have a long mod history. 

They think that way because they grew up with Nintendo. If you would have played Alundra (A Sony IP not Published by them in the West) as your first Zelda you would have a total different opinion on Nintendo games.

Then why are we dealing with a schrodinger's cat scenario then?.

How is it a Schrödinger's cat scenario? A lot of people here game on PC. End of discussion.

@Bolded, and yet there is so little discussion, so little ongoing topics besides the main thread. That is exactly a schro scenario, PC gamers apparently exist in droves here and yet there is so little discussion.

End of discussion as you say.

THe main thread doesn't have us talking about just sales and only sales, there are plenty of tyhreads for console suers not talking about sales.

Either way my point still stands, if the few of here can talk about different PC related topics or games than so can others.

Schrödinger's cat is based on something existing in two different states at the same time until you measure it... In this case, you are talking about two different things (amount of PC gamers and the PC community itself), so it's not in any way like Schrödinger's cat, because you aren't talking about the same thing existing yet not existing, you are talking about one thing existing (a substantial amount of PC gamers on the forum), but a completely different thing not existing (a substantial amount of PC focused discussion on the forum). Not schrödinger's cat.

Sales are a topic of discussion whenever there isn't much news, I've seen PC sales topics from non PC folk when they look at Steam spy and the same for those that are PC gamers, hell the recent XCOM

thread has me and another poster actually posting sales data, two topics in one thread at once.

YOu are saying PC gamers exist in big numbers on here and yet I'm not seeing any in terms of PC centric activity, it's like you are telling me something is right in front of me but I;m literally not seeing anhytyhing, no noise or movement.

End of the day I see little PC discussion despite there apparently being *lots* of PC gamers on here. If it;s going to go back and forth like this (between two people now) then I'll just disagree heavily, I'm sorry but I just don't see it your way at all.

Yeah, lots of PC gamers doesn't equate to there being lots of PC centric activity. Like I just explained though, that has nothing to do with the principle behind Schrödinger's cat (and frankly, thought experiments to explain quantum mechanics really have no place in a discussion like this...). Furthermore, what even counts as "PC centric activity"? Has it occured to you that much of the "PC" activity occurs in "multiplat" threads about multiplat games like Fallout 4, The Witcher 3, GTA, Metal Gear Solid, etc?

I'm not sure what you are disagreeing with me on. Are you disagreeing that these PC gamers exist? Because I can prove that they do, pretty irrefutably.

The way you and I see people who are "dedicated" are very different. When I see dedication at work, I see people doing what they love, talking of what they love, same with local aid volounteers on my island, I actually see them about in my daily life, I don't jsut hear but not see a single one for years on end, heck I even see them in my local paper each week. Even though you talk of overlap, it still doesn't stop you from popping by one in a while to talk about something PC related, I mean what has stopped you for a year so far in popping in a few times to our main thread?, same for everyone else?. What literally binds your will and soul from clicking on a thread to a topic of a platform you're apparently dedicated to?.

All I am asking is that so called dedicated PC users interact more than simply going "I'm sparticus" and then sitting back down never to say anything again until the same question is asked. Seriously that's all I'm asking.