kingofwale said: (A), that would have you assuming the NPD has inferior algroithms than VGC. a baseless assumption that will be the laughing stock of the internet gaming community if this is suggested anywhere else.
B) Are you telling me VGC has more accurate data than NPD over a extend period of time? yeah, and this is where this debate ends. I see the whole idea of "logic" is completely out of the window, a lost cause. |
(A) NO NO NO you FAIL to understand. The GENERAL statement is true under those conditions. In that particular case it is only true if the evidence supports it which is what we are discussing in B. Do you deny that the GENERAL statement is true?
(B) I recall distinctly that that was the case a few months back; I think the consensus was that NPD failed to adjust properly for some specific anomaly. VGC adjusted their numbers when NPD came out and re-adjusted them back when manufacturer numbers released later yet appeared to support the original VGC numbers. I will try to dig them up but in the meantime do you honestly deny all recollection of this, or maybe you weren't around back then?
[edit: Hell with it, searching VGChartz news/thread archives takes too long without a search function and you'll never be convinced by either of those anyway. I'm not delusional enough to manufacture such a memory, and if you think I'm lying, well, I can live with that.]