PerturbedKitty said:
Soundwave said: I've been pretty consistent in my position that the NX is a unified platform. As such to me it doesn't matter when it launches, when ever the first model launches that's pretty much it. It's the NX-era, everything before basically becomes a legacy platform including the Wii U. Even if it wasn't a unified platform, I don't believe Nintendo can support two high-end 3D gaming platforms (as the 3DS successor would almost certainly have close to Wii U graphics itself). In either scenario, that's the effective death knell end for the Wii U. And sure they could just release the NX console in 2016 too. All I'm saying is in any scenario the Wii U is effectively a dead platform in any scenario. It will have another 20-25 releases total in its lifespan (retail) and that's probably it, and of that maybe 6-7 will be really worth playing. I believe the system is pretty much effectively done, because release dates don't determine shit, it's Nintendo's R&D and even to make the release dates for NX that you yourself propose it means Wii U development largely had to stop a while ago. It takes Nintendo 2-3 years to make a high quality 3D game, even if its just the NX portable coming for 2016 that doesn't somehow "save" the Wii U. |
Sigh... and round and round we go I suppose.
This is the bottom line here: a 3ds successor is not a wii u replacent. You can go back pages and pages of people posting and you're the only one who has ever suggested that and it was just recently. You literally just came up with this idea, and i even go out of my way to say in the OP that the 3DS might get replaced, but not the Wii U. Handhelds dont replace consoles.
Plus I already refuted your points when I said no, you're wrong, no, no, you're wrong, and I've yet to see any refutation of those points whatsoever.
|
If NX is a unified platform, then yes NX is a replacement for everything, but I'm speaking more from a practical POV ... Nintendo has to support the 3DS successor 110% with their last dying breath if that's what it takes because if that fails then even you cannot be naive enough to not understand what happens next.
So functionally the 3DS successor (which I think IS the NX and many others do also) is the one that has been getting Nintendo's top R&D attention. And likely has been for a while, since you can't just make games in 6-7 months, certainly not Nintendo games. We all know Nintendo games average development times in the 2-3 year range, even 3DS projects and 3DS successor will certainly be far more powerful than a 3DS.
That's where I think yours and Nem's arguement falls apart, you guys are fighting so hard, but really the NX era is already started within Nintendo. The Wii U is not going to get the next 3D Mario or next Splatoon or next Retro game or any of that in all likely hood ... because much of this content has to be on the 3DS successor, which *rightly* so deserves every single bit of attention from Nintendo.
It is the most important product launch arguably in their company history, if they are to have any future in the hardware business that product *must* be a success. Failure is not an option.
People get mad at me for saying this stuff, but you're just barking at the messenger, I didn't create this situation, Nintendo did with a previous 5-6 years of very poor decision making and misreads of the market in virtually every demographic possible.