Personally, an old port would still be interesting if it offered something new and fresh for the experience. For example, Resident Evil 4: Wii edition was great post-launch game, even if Re4 was released GC almost 2 years before - it had all the extras from the Ps2 version, plus wiimote controls. The same goes for some New Play Control games released by Nintendo, like Pikmin1/2 and Metroid Prime (though they were released later).

The problem is most WiiU launch games were old, half-assed and didn't add much to the original experience.

Hmm yeah, that is true. If there was an option to play Assassin's Creed but as Zero Suit Samus, or use Link or other chaarcters in Tekken Tag Tourney 2, I think I would be interested in getting those games. Though I dunno if those ports offered new extras in them...

Software isn't going to produced faster, but redundancies will be eliminated (they won't need to make two Mario Kart games) and the perceived amount of software that is produced will go up. There actually won't be more games, but without them being divided onto two systems, people will view NX a lot differently than previous systems.

None of the Wii games you listed were worth $50, except for the two first party titles you smuggled in. Casual games didn't have a higher success rate on the Wii, but third parties were first and foremost in for the quick buck to subsidize development of their HD games for PS3 and 360; Ubisoft even straight up admitted it. There was no honest intent to build lasting relationships with consumers and the software output of most publishers clearly shows that.

Tekken Tag 2 offered a lot of extras for Wii U...still flopped. But i have a question, why do they NEED extras? Isnt it enough that they release the same time as others? Does a dev really have to add extra stuff to the version of a game that they know wont even get close to the sales of other versions?

If you want to play the opinion card, then you won't be able to claim that they were worth $50 either.

Success rate implies percentage. So yes, I dare to claim that core games had a higher success rate on the Wii.

Sales numbers and used game prices can be used as metrics to determine the value of a game. Based on those, the games weren't worth $50.

Percentage of games made, of course. What else would it be? If you don't even know the definition of a term (in this case, success rate), why do you rush to post a counter-argument? A counter-argument that obviously doesn't work because you don't know what you are arguing against in the first place.

Tekken Tag 2 offered a lot of extras for Wii U...still flopped. But i have a question, why do they NEED extras? Isnt it enough that they release the same time as others? Does a dev really have to add extra stuff to the version of a game that they know wont even get close to the sales of other versions?

http://www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/?name=tekken+tag+tournament+2&publisher=&platform=&genre=&minSales=0&results=200

Tekken Tag 2 flopped in general, compare the userbase of WiiU at launch date to those of Ps3 and 360 and you'll see it has actually flopped less on WiiU compared to other paltforms.

No if they make the same game at the same time and with a good port I'm not expecting any extra. With my inital post I was referring to games arriving late.

I'll respond to you if you make an effort to understand the things that I was saying. Would be nice of you.