$30 is enough to justify a review score below par.

It seems like M$ doesn't want the Wii U version to sell at all. Not only that they're forcing the DLC onto people, thus charging 30$, there's no gamepad support, and just today, M$ announces that all versions, except the Wii U is getting a huge update.

M$ is extremely paranoid of the Wii U.

That update was a long time in the works.  MC gets always updated so will the Wii U version, talking about features it is not that far behind from the start like 1.6.4 features?

Too expensive or maybe a bad port.

Because these reviewers are the first to review Minecraft and give it a score closer to one it should get... 5/10. These are the most truthful reviews to date.

It's because when compared to Mario Maker, it's a 70.

I think it has to do with the price being higher. not really necessarily fair since it has nothing to do with the gameplay but still... ..

also since its been out so long obviously the excitement has died down and reviewers recognize that. Lastly a lotttt of people seem annoyed that Minecraft was put on the Wii U yet does not utilize the Gamepad (which would be like perfect for the game)

so I think it makes sense. 70 seems kind of low, yeah.

I will agree that something like Mario Maker arguably IS the Minecraft for Nintendo so maybe Minecraft seems a bit out of sorts on the console at this point

so price, release date, lack of Gamepad support

Probably because of the cost, and content wise, it doesn't add much from the 360/PS3 versions.

Yeah, I won't be upset in the least if Minecraft 2 doesn't show up on NX.

Costs More.
Game's been released on everything since at least 2013.
Ton of potential wasted.
Probably runs/looks much worse than the Ps4 and XB1 versions.