By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - How much do you expect Starfox Zero to sell?

 

?

500k or less 58 16.29%
 
500k - 1m 142 39.89%
 
1m - 1.5m 104 29.21%
 
Over 1.5m 52 14.61%
 
Total:356
Ryng on 13 December 2015

About what has in the name.

[SPOILER] Less than 1 million[/SPOILER]



Around the Network
Miyamotoo on 14 December 2015
curl-6 said:
Versus_Evil said:

sub 100k FW, 300K lifetime, 64-68 meta. It looks terrible, wii u can and has done better.

Whoa, them's fighting words!  

You seeing this Miyamotoo? XD

 

 

Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

Miyamoto's "Movie length" comment does imply a short game based on multiple playthroughs, which is also consistent with Starfox SNES and Starfox N64.

 

Like I wrote, I am pretty sure that Miyamoto was misunderstand about length of game. I dont expect long game, but certainly dont expect "material that will have only around 2-3 hours". I expecting main campaign with around 4-6 hours, but with great replayability and some additional content (maybe that Project Guard or something similar), so that would be far more material than only 2-3 hours.

There's not a lot of room for misunderstanding in: 

"We want it to be that you can complete the course of the game in the same amount of time you would spend watching a movie"

http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2015/06/16/a-star-fox-zero-conversation-with-shigeru-miyamoto-and-his-team.aspx

Again, I dont expect long game, but certainly dont expect "material that will have only around 2-3 hours". I expecting main campaign with around 4-6 hours, but with great replayability and some additional content (maybe that Project Guard or something similar), so that would be far more material than only 2-3 hours.





curl-6 on 14 December 2015
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

There's not a lot of room for misunderstanding in: 

"We want it to be that you can complete the course of the game in the same amount of time you would spend watching a movie"

http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2015/06/16/a-star-fox-zero-conversation-with-shigeru-miyamoto-and-his-team.aspx

Again, I dont expect long game, but certainly dont expect "material that will have only around 2-3 hours". I expecting main campaign with around 4-6 hours, but with great replayability and some additional content (maybe that Project Guard or something similar), so that would be far more material than only 2-3 hours.

What are you basing your 4-6 hour prediction on, though?

I'm basing mine of Miyamoto himself's word.





Miyamotoo on 14 December 2015
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:

Again, I dont expect long game, but certainly dont expect "material that will have only around 2-3 hours". I expecting main campaign with around 4-6 hours, but with great replayability and some additional content (maybe that Project Guard or something similar), so that would be far more material than only 2-3 hours.

What are you basing your 4-6 hour prediction on, though?

I'm basing mine of Miyamoto himself's word.

Because I find that is impossible that Nintendo release games that have length of 2-3 hours for $60 game (event for $40) game in 2016.





curl-6 on 14 December 2015
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

What are you basing your 4-6 hour prediction on, though?

I'm basing mine of Miyamoto himself's word.

Because I find that is impossible that Nintendo release games that have length of 2-3 hours for $60 game (event for $40) game in 2016.

Why? 

Mario Tennis Ultra Smash is $50 and has less content than some $20 games.





Around the Network
Miyamotoo on 14 December 2015
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:

Because I find that is impossible that Nintendo release games that have length of 2-3 hours for $60 game (event for $40) game in 2016.

Why? 

Mario Tennis Ultra Smash is $50 and has less content than some $20 games.

Beacuse I dont think Nintendo would release games that have length of 2-3 hours for $60 game (even for $40) game in 2016. :)

Well Mario Tennis is sport game with online play, not exactly same thing.





curl-6 on 14 December 2015
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

Why? 

Mario Tennis Ultra Smash is $50 and has less content than some $20 games.

Beacuse I dont think Nintendo would release games that have length of 2-3 hours for $60 game (even for $40) game in 2016. :)

Well Mario Tennis is sport game with online play, not exactly same thing.

So you'll flat out ignore a direct statement from Shigeru Miyamoto, the game's producer?



Miyamotoo on 14 December 2015
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

Why? 

Mario Tennis Ultra Smash is $50 and has less content than some $20 games.

Beacuse I dont think Nintendo would release games that have length of 2-3 hours for $60 game (even for $40) game in 2016. :)

Well Mario Tennis is sport game with online play, not exactly same thing.

So you'll flat out ignore a direct statement from Shigeru Miyamoto, the game's producer?

Like I already wrote, I am pretty sure that Miyamoto was misunderstand about length of game, it wouldn't be first time that Nintendo statements from Japanese is misunderstand, because I don't believe that Nintendo would release game that have length of 2-3 hours in 2016. I just cant imagine game like that.



curl-6 on 14 December 2015
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

So you'll flat out ignore a direct statement from Shigeru Miyamoto, the game's producer?

Like I already wrote, I am pretty sure that Miyamoto was misunderstand about length of game, it wouldn't be first time that Nintendo statements from Japanese is misunderstand, because I don't believe that Nintendo would release game that have length of 2-3 hours in 2016. I just cant imagine game like that.

So basically, you are in denial.





Miyamotoo on 14 December 2015
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

So you'll flat out ignore a direct statement from Shigeru Miyamoto, the game's producer?

Like I already wrote, I am pretty sure that Miyamoto was misunderstand about length of game, it wouldn't be first time that Nintendo statements from Japanese is misunderstand, because I don't believe that Nintendo would release game that have length of 2-3 hours in 2016. I just cant imagine game like that.

So basically, you are in denial.

No, just thinking very realistically, that Nintendo will not release game in 2016. that have length of 2-3 hours, and it not first time that Nintendo Japanese statements are misunderstood.